Flussdiagramm
Physical Attactiveness
Inhalt des Flussdiagramms
PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS
Physical Attractiveness
- Men place great importance on physical attractiveness in a mate.
Matching Hypothesis - individuals seek out partners whose social desirability approximately equals their own.
Key Study: Walster and Walster (1966)
Procedure - male and female students completed questionnaires and were rated for physical attractiveness. Partners are allocated randomly, although the students believed they were matched in terms of personality and intelligence.
Findings - Participants responded more positively if their dates were physically attractive than 'matched'.
Evaluation
- Speed dating and the challenge to traditional views of attraction (Eastwick and Finkel found no gender differences in importance of physical attractiveness.
- Value for physical attractiveness may not predict real-life partner choice.
- Research support for sex differences in the importance of physical attractiveness, according to Meltzer.
- Implications of sex differences in the importance of physical attractiveness, according to Meltzer et al.
- Complex matching means a person may compensate for a lack of physical attractiveness with other desirable qualities.
- Matching may not be that important in initial attraction, according to Taylor et al.
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- A2 A2 Psychology (Relationships end-of-chapter summary (mind maps)) Flussdiagramm am Physical Attactiveness, erstellt von Becky . am 30/07/2018.
- Erstellt von
- Becky .
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung