Mindmap
Anxiety

Inhalt der Mindmap
Anxiety
Yerkes-Dodson Law
Deffenbacher et al. (2004)
- Meta-analysis
- High anxiety = low accuracy
- Strength: no ethical issues - no more anxiety than normal
- Weakness: could inherit methodological flaws
- Meta-analysis
Christianson and Hubinette (1993)
- questioned 58 witnessers of real-life robberies
- found that those threatened in some way had improved recall and remembered more details
- Strength: real life robberies - high external validity
- Weakness: low population validity
- questioned 58 witnessers of real-life robberies
Weapon-focus effect
- Loftus et al. (1987)
- Participants heard a discussion in an adjoining room
- Condition 1: man exited with a pen and greasy hands
- 49% accurate
- Condition 2: a man exited with a paperknife and bloody hands
- 33% accurate
- Conclusion: weapon distracted the witness away from the person holding it
- 33% accurate
- Condition 2: a man exited with a paperknife and bloody hands
- 49% accurate
- Condition 1: man exited with a pen and greasy hands
- Strength: lack of demand characteristics
- Weakness: individual differences (how they will react to the weapon)
- Participants heard a discussion in an adjoining room
- Loftus et al. (1987)
Bilder und Dateien der Mindmap
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Anxiety, erstellt von web.skippr2 am 18/01/2015.
- Erstellt von
- web.skippr2
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung
