Mindmap
Memory
Inhalt der Mindmap
Memory
Memory
- Working Memory Model (Baddeley and Hitch)
- Components
- The Central Executive
- Controls the other slave systems
- Phonological Loop
- Phonological Store
- Inner Ear
- Articulatory Loop
- Inner Voice
- Phonological Store
- Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad
- Visually organizes information
- The Central Executive
- Strengths
- Farah et al reported that LH was good at spatial tasks but not visual imagery
- Visual and Spatial tasks require separate systems
- Baddeley and Hitch - doing two things at once
- Doing tasks that uses the same component causes difficutly.
- Farah et al reported that LH was good at spatial tasks but not visual imagery
- Weakness
- Not allot of research into the central executive
- Components
- Multi Store Model (Atkinson and Shiffrin)
- STM encoded acoustically
- Conrad - Showed strings of letters quickly to participants and they had to recall the letters.
- B and V were muddles with P but S was only very rarely muddled with S
- Visual information must have been converted into sound to be encoded.
- B and V were muddles with P but S was only very rarely muddled with S
- Conrad - Showed strings of letters quickly to participants and they had to recall the letters.
- STM capacity
- Miller said the capacity of the short term memory was 7 +/- 2
- STM duration
- Very limited to we hold onto information for longer by rehearsing it.
- Peterson and Peterson showed participants trigrams and made them count backwards in threes.
- After 18 seconds of counting backwards they could not remember the trigrams
- Trigrams are not reflective of real world tasks
- Used university students which may not be fully representative of the population..
- LTM encoded semantically
- LTM capacity and duration
- Bahrick et al used participants from the US and asked them about their yearbook.
- Remember as many class mates names as they could
- 15 years = 60% accurate
- 48 years =30% accurate
- Recognise names and faces
- 15 years = 90% accurate
- 48 years = 75% accurate
- uses meaningful stimuli which creates more realistic findings
- Cannot control whether participants has looked through their yearbook since leaving school
- unknown whether permission was given for all images to be used
- Remember as many class mates names as they could
- Bahrick et al used participants from the US and asked them about their yearbook.
- Evaluation
- Murdock - primancy and recency effect
- words learnt at the start are more likely to have been rehearsed and therefore stored in the LTM
- Most recent words still stored in the short term memory
- KF
- could not recall one or two numbers in the digital span test however LTM memory was fine
- Tulvig - MSM doesn't distinguish between different types of LTM
- Murdock - primancy and recency effect
- STM encoded acoustically
- Eye Witness Testimony
- Misleading Questions
- Loftus and Palmer - showed car crash videos to 45 students
- 'How fast were they going when they ...... into each other?'
- Smashed = 41 mph
- Contacted = 32 mph
- Not real life
- 'How fast were they going when they ...... into each other?'
- Loftus and Palmer - showed car crash videos to 45 students
- Anxiety
- Loftus and Palmer monitored the gaze of participants when shown a film of a crime.
- They tended to focus their gaze on the gun used in the robbery
- Less able to identify robber
- Weapon Focus
- They tended to focus their gaze on the gun used in the robbery
- The Yerkes-Dodson law
- There is an ideal or optimum point where anxiety helps memory.
- Loftus and Palmer monitored the gaze of participants when shown a film of a crime.
- The Cognitive Interview
- Techniques
- Context Reinstatement
- Mentally recreate the situation
- Weather, mood etc.
- Mentally recreate the situation
- Change Perspective
- Recall in Reverse
- Recall Everything
- Context Reinstatement
- Limitations
- Time consuming
- Requires Training
- Geiselman
- Participants watched a film on a violent crime
- 35% more accurate in cognitive interview
- Participants watched a film on a violent crime
- Techniques
- Age
- Young
- Ceci et al found that children ages 3-4 were most susceptible to having memories altered by leading questions
- Memories are weaker and fade faster
- Goodman and Schaff - a child's ability to comprehend and answer the question affect recall
- Ceci et al found that children ages 3-4 were most susceptible to having memories altered by leading questions
- Old
- Coxon and Valentine
- Young children and elderly people were less accurate in their recall than young adults
- Participants shown a video of a staged crime
- elderly people were less reliable but this was due to less compete recall rather than susceptibility to leading questions
- Coxon and Valentine
- Young
- Misleading Questions
- Working Memory Model (Baddeley and Hitch)
Memory Improvement Strategies
- Method of Loci
- linking verbal pieces of information with visual images uses two coding systems. Creating a stronger memory.
- Croviz - two groups required to memorize a list of 32 words
- 78% recall in loci and 25% in standard
- Narrative Chainging
- Bower and Clark asked participants to learn 12 lists of 12 words
- narrative groups recalled 94% and non narrative recalled 14%
- Bower and Clark asked participants to learn 12 lists of 12 words
- Acronyms
- Not easy to form
- May have to rearrange the order of events, which isn't good if the order is important
- Needs to be committed to memory which takes effect
- Method of Loci
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Memory, erstellt von Zoë Kirk am 18/03/2016.
- Erstellt von
- Zoë Kirk
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung