Mindmap
ATTACHMENT

Inhalt der Mindmap
ATTACHMENT
A close 2 way emotional bond where each individual sees the other as essential for their own emotional security
INTERACTIONS & FIGURES
- Reciprocity- interaction is reciprocal when each person responds to the other + elicits a response from them
- Murray + Trevarthen- mums had frozen face + didn't interact -->babies upset
- interactional synchrony- caregiver + infant reflect the actions + emotions of each other in a co-ordinated way
- although important these interactions are not necessary to form attachments
- Isabella et al- observed 30 mums + kids --> high levels of synchrony =better mother-infant attachments
- Role of dad- a playmate role + which encourages the child to take risks
- Reciprocity- interaction is reciprocal when each person responds to the other + elicits a response from them
STAGES OF ATTACHMENT
- 3) Specific attachment (7-9 months)
- show stranger anxiety + from primary attachment figure to which they show separation anxiety
- 2) Indiscriminate (6 weeks- 7 months)
- preference to humans over objects, + accept comfort from anyone
- 1) Asocial (0-6 weeks)
- baby treats humans + objects the same, but is happier with humans
- 4) Multiple attachment (10 months onwards)
- form secondary attachments with regulars in their life,
- info found by Schaffer + Emerson
- 60 babies from Glasgow working-class, visited every month, then at 18 months, mums were asked questions about how babies acted towards separation + strangers in everyday situations
- 25-32 weeks 50% had specific attachment, which formed with adult that interacted with baby most (reciprocity), 40 weeks 80% had specific attachment
- 60 babies from Glasgow working-class, visited every month, then at 18 months, mums were asked questions about how babies acted towards separation + strangers in everyday situations
- 3) Specific attachment (7-9 months)
ANIMAL STUDIES
- Konrad Lorenz
- control group: eggs hatched with goose mum + imprinted on her experimental : eggs hatched incubated with Lorenz +imprinted on him
- speices that are precocial (mobile from birth) form attachment to + follow 1st moving object they see, must occur during critical period (different for different species)
- Sexual imprinting- imprinting animals use parent (whoever they imprinted on) as template/model for mate preferences in later life.
- Lorenz found that peacocks that imprinted on giant tortoises, only directed courtship behaviour to giant tortoises as adults
- Sexual imprinting- imprinting animals use parent (whoever they imprinted on) as template/model for mate preferences in later life.
- speices that are precocial (mobile from birth) form attachment to + follow 1st moving object they see, must occur during critical period (different for different species)
- control group: eggs hatched with goose mum + imprinted on her experimental : eggs hatched incubated with Lorenz +imprinted on him
- Harry Harlow
- 16 baby monkeys were placed with 2 wire dolls, 1 doll was plain but had milk, the other was covered in cloth + dispensed milk
- monkeys preffered to cuddle clothed doll than wired even when scared regardless of which had milk, showing comfort was more important than food it terms of attachment behaviour
- these monkeys became maternally deprived as they never had a 'real'' mother, the results of this were: aggressiveness, bad at mating--> less breeding, neglected + attacked their kids
- those who had non-clothed doll were worst
- Harlow said the critical period for monkeys was 90 days, after this attachment was impossible
- 16 baby monkeys were placed with 2 wire dolls, 1 doll was plain but had milk, the other was covered in cloth + dispensed milk
- Konrad Lorenz
EXPLANATIONS: LEARNING THOERY
- Classical conditioning- learning to associate 2 different stimuli together so that the response to them becomes the same,
- CUPBOARD LOVE
- Operant conditioning- learning to repeat or stop behaviour through reinforcement
- Positive reinforcement- behaviour is repeated due to a reward
- babies cries + is rewarded with comfort--> babies cries again later (positive reinforcement)
- babies cries + is rewarded with comfort--> babies cries again later (positive reinforcement)
- Negative reinforcement- behaviour is repeated due to to stopping something unpleasant
- adult doesn't like noise so comforts baby--> noise stops for a while (negative reinforcement)
- this use of reinforcement strengthens attachment between 2
- adult doesn't like noise so comforts baby--> noise stops for a while (negative reinforcement)
- Positive reinforcement- behaviour is repeated due to a reward
- Classical conditioning- learning to associate 2 different stimuli together so that the response to them becomes the same,
EXPLANATIONS: BOWLBY'S THEORY
- Critical period- if attachment hasn't been formed at 2yrs it'll be much harder to form one later, but not impossible.
- Internal working model (IWM)- a mental representation of relationship with primary caregiver that child forms
- IWM acts as template for how that child views relationships, so effects future relationships including their relationship with their kids.
- Monotropic theory- a child had 1 main attachment (with primary attachment figure) that was more important than others
- more predictable kid's behaviour =better attachment
- effects of separation add up, so it's best to have no seaparation
- Social releasers- babies are born with innate cute behaviours e.g. gripping to get attention + cause reciprocity between baby & adult
THE STRANGE SITUATION
- Ainsworth used to assess a child's quality of attachment, the behaviours used to judge attachment were:
- Proximity seeking- staying close to caregiver shows good attachment
- Exploration- good attachment--►kid feels confident exploring using caregiver as secure base
- Separation anxiety- protesting at separation from caregiver--► shows attachment
- Stranger anxiety- anxiety when stranger approaches--► shows attachment
- Reunion- child's response to reunion with caregiver after short separation
- Ainsworth found 3 patterns in behaviour + made 3 attachment types:
- Secure attachment: explore happily, use CG as secure base + regualry return, moderate separation + stranger anxiety, accept comfort in reunion
- Insecure-resistant: explore less, high proximity, massive strange + separation anxiety, resist comfort at reunion
- Insecure-avoidant: explore freely no secure base or proximity, no separation or stranger anxiety, don't need comfort at reunion
- Ainsworth used to assess a child's quality of attachment, the behaviours used to judge attachment were:
CULTURAL VARIATIONS IN ATTACHMENT
- Simonella et al (2014) conducted study in Italy , 76 1yr olds, 50% secure, 36% avoidant.
- 32 studies using the strange situation were meta-analysed 18/32 studies were from US rest were from 7 different countries
- countries have different cultures, this could explain the difference across countries in attachment types,
- Collectivist cultures- cooperation within families/groups is a priority, there's less independence, so there's less avoidant e.g. Japan
- Individualistic cultures- independence + individual goals are valued in these cultures so there have less resistant e.g. Germany
- countries have different cultures, this could explain the difference across countries in attachment types,
- Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg, investigated the attachment types across + within different cultures
BOWLBY'S MATERNAL DEPRIVATION
- Emotional + intellectual effects of separation between child + attachment figure
- effects on intellectual development=mental retardation (low IQ)
- effects on emotional development= affectionless psychopathy- no empathy, so can't develop normal relationships + more likely to be criminals as they don't get victims feelings, so no remorse e.g. Dexter
- 44 Thieves- 14/44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths, 12/14 of the psychopaths had had maternal deprivation. Control group: 2/44 had experienced separations
- Emotional + intellectual effects of separation between child + attachment figure
INSTITUTIONALISATION: ROMANIAN ORPHANS
- institutionalised kids lack 1 on 1 attachments due to multiple carers, no primary attachment figure
- Rutter observed 165 adopted Romanian orphans over time. 52 British adoptees were control group,
- Zeanah et al used starnge situation on 95 kids 12-31 months who'd spent most of live in institution 19% were secure + 65% were disinhibited control group: 50 kids never institution, 74% of control were secure
- at first all showed mental retardation + undernoushinment
- at 11 IQ of those adopted before 6 months was higher than those adopted between 6 months- 2 yrs, IQ was even lower for those adopted after 2yrs. At 16 pattern was same
- those adopted after 6 months showed disinhibited attachment, symptoms are: clingy attention seeking, indiscriminate to all adults even strangers
EARLY ATTACHMENT ON LATER RELATIONSHIPS
- childhood attachments, form IWM that acts as template for future relationships
- 99 mother-baby attachments were tested with strange situation + same mother and her mother (grandmother) attachment was tested with AAI, majority had same attachment type to both their mother + baby
- In 40 women that were tested as kids securely attached had best friendships + romantic relationships, insecure-resistant struggled keeping friends, insecure-avoidant struggled with intimacy in romantic relationships
- Hazan + Shaver analysed 620 replies to a love quiz about number of partners, emotions + most important relationship, 56% were identified as securely attached, 25% avoidant + 19% resisant
- securely attached kids have good friendships insecure-resistant more likely to be bullies, insecure-avoidant more likely to be bullied
Bilder und Dateien der Mindmap
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- AS - Level Psychology (ATTACHMENT) Mindmap am ATTACHMENT, erstellt von Ma-adjoa Akwah am 13/05/2016.
- Erstellt von
- Ma-adjoa Akwah
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung
