GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Mind map

Freehold Covenants

Vicky Babs Land Degree English

Mind map on freehold covenants: identify the covenants and identify the potential breaches

Mind map: Freehold covenants

Map content

Freehold Covenants

  1. identify the covenants

    • Identify the potential breaches
      • who needs to be shown to have the burden?
        • burden cannot pass at law - Austerbury v Oldham
        • passing the burden in equity - Tulk v Moxhay hurdles
          • restrictive
            • common intention - Morell's v Oxford Utd FC
              • benefits DT - LCC v Allen
                • Notice/registration - S2(5) LCA/S32(1) LRA
      • who needs to be shown to have the benefit?
        • passing at common law - S136 LPA
          • express - S136 LPA
            • written notice but only where original covenantor retains the land and new covenantee owns all the original covenantee's land
          • implied - S78 LPA
            • works with part sales
            • touches/concerns the land - PA Swift v English Stores
              • -benefits covenantee for the time being - affects the nature/quality of the land -not expressed to be personal
              • covenantee has the legal estate in the land benefited
                • Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board - cannot be an equitable estate in that land
                • assaingee has the legal estate in the land benefited
                  • cannot be an equitable estate in the land
                  • benefit must have been intended to run

Information

Description
Degree Land Mind Map on Freehold Covenants, created by Vicky Babs on 05/05/2013.
Created by
Vicky Babs
Views
195
Tags
land
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?