Mind map
DEFENCES
Map content
DEFENCES
UNINTENTIONAL DEFAMATION
- S. 7 of DA
- (a) no intention to publish and no knowledge ( E Hulton & Co. v Jones)
- (b) words are not defamatory on the surface and no knowledge it could be defamatory ( Cassidy v Daily Mirror NP)
- Reasonable Care (Ross v Hopkinson)
- Offer of Amends
- S. 7 of DA
JUSTIFICATION
- S. 8 of DA
- Prove the words are SUBSTANTIALLY true
- Once the defamatory statement is proven to be true, the law will not protect the Plaintiff (Institute of Commercial Management UK v News Straits Times Press (M)
- Defence will survive it other allegations is not proven as long as the substantial claim is proven true
- S. 8 of DA
FAIR COMMENT
- S. 9 of DA
- An OPINION
- TEST : Whether an ordinary reasonable man would regard the statement as fact/comments
- Based of TRUE FACTS
- SB Palmer v AS Rajah & Ors
- PUBLIC INTEREST
- NO MALICE
- An OPINION
- S. 9 of DA
PRIVILEGE
- ABSOLUTE
- S. 11 of DA
- Fair, Accurate reports on COURTS PROCEEDINGS
- must be FAIR and BONA FIDE
- Article 63 (3) FC
- official parliamentary papers
- S. 11 of DA
- QUALIFIED
- STATUTE
- NEWSPAPER ONLY S. 12 of the DA
- Fair and Accurate
- No MALICE
- Not blasphemous, seditious/ indecent
- public interest
- NEWSPAPER ONLY S. 12 of the DA
- COMMON LAW
- No MALICE
- Have legal, moral and social duties
- STATUTE
- ABSOLUTE
CONSENT
- Can be a complete defence if can prove consent given by Plaintiff
APOLOGY
- S. 10 of the DA
- mitigating factor
- S. 10 of the DA
Information
- Description
- CommLaw Mind Map on DEFENCES, created by norhidayah raziap on 16/03/2017.
- Created by
- norhidayah raziap · Mar 2017
- Updated
- Mar 16, 2017
- Views
- 0
- Rating