Tort Law: General Principles mind maps
462 mind maps by 283 users · Page 1 of 12
This Tort Law: General Principles page on GoConqr gathers mind maps on negligence, nuisance, liability and damages. University students and professional candidates can practice tracing duties and liability, while teachers can find material for lessons. There are over 450 mind maps, mainly at university level, with some for professional preparation and school study. Choose a topic and explore a map.
Select topic
- Negligence161
- Duty of care65
- Breach of duty20
- Causation and remoteness44
- Economic loss and psychiatric injury26
- Occupiers' liability62
- Employers' liability9
- Vicarious liability41
- Intentional torts and trespass to the person67
- Trespass to land5
- Nuisance65
- Strict liability, Rylands v Fletcher and product liability43
- Defamation and privacy30
- Defences in tort27
- Damages and remedies in tort22
Mind maps
-
46 nodesLaw of Tort - General Negligence To establish negligen...
-
86 nodesBreach & Causation Breach (Essay) · Causation (Problem Qu... · 2. Issues regarding t...
-
45 nodesOccupiers Liability Obligation to ensure ... · Occupier - a person w... · Visitors · Duty Of Care · Occupiers Liability A...
-
40 nodesVicarious Liability Employee · Vicarious liability i... · Economic Test determi... · Course of employment · Extension of the Work... · Frolics of their own
-
87 nodesGeneral Principles in Damages Damages · exceptions for damages · advantage from damages · DEFINE · loss of future reputa...
-
43 nodesprivate nuisance general principles of... · material damage · intangible interferen... · title to sue · who can be sued · defences
-
27 nodesEmployers liability Common law duty · Statutory duty
-
18 nodesDefamation A defamatory statemen... · Libel · Slander · Constitutional Defama...
-
41 nodesNuisance Who can sue · Elements · Who is liable · Remedies · Public Nuisance · Rylands v Fletcher
-
6 nodesDonoghue v. Stevenson (1932) In 1928 a friend boug... · Donoghue suffered fro... · Originally there had ... · There was no relation... · Case went to an appea...
-
24 nodesRylands v Fletcher imposes strict liabil... · Non-natural user of land · Brings onto land and ... · For own purposes anyt... · Escape · forseeability of dama...
-
21 nodesEconomic Loss Consequential · Pure
-
21 nodesTort/Tort of Negligence But for · Civil wrong · The Tortious liabilit... · Activity - decide on ... · Burden of proof on th...
-
8 nodesThe Law of Torts Its a Civil wrong doi... · Negligence is a cator...
-
106 nodesPrivate Nuisance (1) Can C Sue? (Stand...
-
116 nodesOccupiers' Liability Act 1957 (1) Establishing Liab...
-
214 nodesTort - Defamation Libel · Slander · 1 - A defamatory Stat... · 2 - Statement must re... · 3 - Publication · DEFENCES
-
45 nodesOccupier's Liability Non-Visitor · Visitor
-
63 nodesNEGLIGENCE DUTY?
-
144 nodes6.Defamation 6.2 Who can sue in de... · 6.3 Is the statement ... · 6.4 Has the claimant ... · 6.5 Is the statement ... · 6.6 Does the statemen... · 6.1 Define Defamation
-
79 nodesBreach of Duty of Care Objective Test · Exceptions/Special Rules · Justifying the Tests · Breach and Relation t... · Factors for Deciding ...
-
196 nodesNegligence Duty of Care · Breach · Economic Loss · Psychiatric Injury · Causation
-
328 nodesDuty of care Established duty?
-
26 nodesTort of Negligence (Breach of Duty- EXAMPLES) Omission to do someth... · RES IPSA LOQUITUR "th...
-
180 nodesPrivate Nuisance any continuous activi... · claimant · defendant · indirect interference · causing damage · which is unlawful
-
48 nodesNegligence: duty of care (2) 3rd step: refining th... · modern approach · misfeasance and non-f... · Situations where liab... · The type of defendant · chpt2
-
33 nodesLiability in Negligence What is Negligence? · Duty Of Care (DOC) · Breach of Duty · Damage · Res Ipsa Loquitur
-
26 nodesPsychiatric injury CRITICISM Daniel Nolan "Psychia... · Jyoti Ahuja "Liabilit... · Law Commission "Liabi... · H. Teff " Liability f... · Margaret Fordham "PSY...
-
25 nodesFault Fault is defined as "... · Fault Important in Ci... · Fault Less Important ... · Fault Important In Cr... · Fault Less Important ... · Fault Should Be a Par...
-
51 nodesVicarious Liability Stage 1: Employment/A...
-
58 nodesOccupier's Liability 1957 act · 1984 act · occupier · premises · evaluation · defences
-
83 nodesDefamation (1) Establishing the ... · (2) Defences · (3) Remedies · (4) Malicious Falsehood
-
79 nodesDuty of Care - physical injury policy reasons · general principles
-
101 nodesNegligence Elements · Separate Causes of Ac...
-
41 nodesOccupiers' Liability Act 1984 (1) Establishing Liab...
-
122 nodesIntentional Torts Types · Elements · Defenses · Privileges
-
46 nodes1_Law of Tort - General Negligence To establish negligen...
-
41 nodesNegligence & Professional Negligence Tort - a civil wrong · Vital Components in a... · Donoghue v Stevenson ... · Caparo Industries v D... · Causation and the 'Bu... · Professional Negligen...
-
14 nodesNuisance Private · Public
-
21 nodesPure economic loss Not recoverable when ... · Not recoverable when ... · Purchased house, disc... · Negligent statement
More Tort Law: General Principles resources
About tort law: general principles mind maps
GoConqr OriginalExplore Tort Law: General Principles mind maps
These community-made maps offer different routes through the unit. Vicarious Liability distinguishes employees from the self-employed. Occupiers Liability looks at obligations concerning land, while General Principles in Damages covers the objectives and measure of damages.
For a focused starting point, try Vicarious Liability. Its branches give you a way to compare the categories of people involved. Then open Law of Tort - General Negligence to follow duty, breach and damage through a different topic.
Study with the maps
Read a branch, then look away and explain its main point in your own words. Return to the map to check what you missed. If you want to test your recall, switch to a quiz on the unit page; use notes there when you want to read a topic in another format.
Pick a map that matches the topic you are studying and follow its branches.
Frequently asked questions
Which mind map is a good place to start?
Try Vicarious Liability if you want a focused topic. It separates employees from the self-employed, giving you categories to compare as you study. For negligence, Law of Tort - General Negligence brings duty, breach and damage together in one map. Choose the one that fits your current topic.
What topics do these mind maps cover?
The maps cover negligence, nuisance, occupiers liability, economic loss, defamation and damages. Some focus on a case, such as Rylands v Fletcher, while others organize a broader topic. You can look for a map that matches the point you are studying, then follow its branches.
Are the mind maps free to use?
Yes. Every resource listed here is free to open and study without an account. A free account also lets you save quiz scores and make your own mind maps, quizzes, flashcards and notes. The resources on this page were made by GoConqr users.