Female Suffrage
Diapositivas del conjunto (3)
-
The Arguments For & Against Female Suffrage
- Votes for women would improve life for all women, e.g. equal working conditions, better access to education, etc.
- Australia and New Zealand had given women the right to vote in national elections and in the USA, women had the right to vote in some states
- Many women were already involved in politics at a local level, especially on boards of education and poor law boards
- Women paid the same rates and taxes as men, so they should be able to vote for the politicians who spend those taxes
- By the early 1900s, the vast majority of men could vote; Britain was not a democracy if 50% of the adult population could not vote
- Women had different responsibilities or 'spheres'; men were suited to work and politics while women were suited to the home and caring roles
- Most did not want the vote or were not interested; they irrational and would not vote wisely
- Giving the vote to some women would mean giving the vote to all men, some of whom were not worthy
- Women did not fight in wars so they should not be able to vote for governments that might have to declare war
-
Effectiveness of The Suffragists
- Failed to get the vote for women by 1914
- Built up an impressive organisation and membership: by 1914, the NUWSS had over 400 branches and over 100,000 members
- Consisted of mainly middle-class women but there were also quite a few male members
- Managed to get women's suffrage bills proposed to Parliament several times between 1900 and 1914 e.g. Conciliation Bill(1910) - abandoned by the Liberals
- There were many societies campaigning for the vote in Britain during the 19th century. In 1897, the various societies came together to form the NUWSS , often called the suffragists. The NUWSS was led by Millicent Fawcett.
- Very good at propaganda - they made newsletters and posters, organised petitions and wrote letters to MPs; they held large rallies e.g. Hyde Park demonstration(1908) and the Women's Pilgrimage(June 1913)
- Kept the issue of women's suffrage in the public eye at a time when PM Asquith and many other MPs did not want to even consider the issue
-
Suffragettes and their effectiveness
- name given to the WSPU
- founded in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters Sylvia and Christabel
- more radical than NUWSS - frustrated by the lack of progress in the campaign to win women the right to vote
- direct action - intended to attract such publicity the government would end its opposition
- direct action began in 1908 with suffragettes breaking Downing Street windows and chaining themselves to railings
- WSPU called off violent protest in 1910 but began again in 1912 with a campaign of arson and vandalism after the Concilation Bill's failure
- 04/06/1913 - Emily Wilding Davison threw herself in front of King George V's horse at the Epsom Derby and was severely injured, dying 4 days later
- Didn't achieve vote by 1914
- Divided the women's movement; from 1909 onwards, the suffragists distanced themselves from the suffragettes
- Suffragette violence turned some MPs and sections of public opinion against female suffrage
- Issue of female suffrage was never forgotten
- Effective campaigners, publishing poster and leaflets (their newspaper Votes for Women had a circulation of 40,000 by 1914)
- Many people admired their courage e.g. some were arrested and some went on hunger strike
- Police and government treated them very harshly
- Suffragettes were treated harshly in prison and went on hunger strike in protest but the government responded with force-feeding which was painful, degrading and potentially harmful - this gained them support and sympathy;Liberals then introduced the 'Cat and Mouse' Act(1913) - hunger strikers were released in order to recover then returned to finish their sentence
Información
- Descripción
- GCSE (Britain 1890-1918) History Diapositivas sobre Female Suffrage, creado por Kwame Oteng-Adusei el 16/02/2016.
- Creado por
- Kwame Oteng-Adusei
- Visitas
- 60
- Etiquetas
- Valoración