GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Flashcards

Yearlies

Ellie Yiasemides Legal Studies English 53 cards

Cards in this deck (53)

  1. 1Just laws- Equal
    - Utilitarian
    - Redress inequalities
    - Minimise delay
    - Not retrospective
    - Known
  2. 2Nature of justice- Equality
    - Fairness (and justice)
    - Access
  3. 3Procedural Fairness vs Natural Justice vs Rule of LawPF: Fairness in processes resolving disputes
    NJ: Right to be heard, right to have unbiased decision
    ROL: No one is above the law
  4. 4Common lawEquity: morals, individual circumstances
    - Doctrine of precedent (binding, persuasive)
  5. 5Adversarial vs InquisitorialADV: 2 parties prove their case, innocent until proven guilty, judge/jury decide, court as impartial referee. e.g. England, Aus
    INQ: Court actively involved, judges investigate/decide qs/call on witnesses. e.g. Japan, Europe
  6. 6State law hierarchyLow: Local, Children's, Coroner's
    Medium: District
    High: Supreme Court, SC Criminal Appeal
  7. 7Federal law hierarchyLow: Federal Magistrate's Court (copyright, nothing criminal)
    Middle: Federal (civil disputes, criminal offences) and Family (divorce, parenting)
    High: High Court (appeals, law validity, Constitution)
  8. 8Division of powers vs Separation of PowersDIV:
    s51 - exclusive powers (Cth)
    - (i) trade/commerce
    - (xxvi) Indigenous referendum
    SEP:
    Arms: legislature (law making), executive (execute), judicial (interpret)
    To avoid risk of dictatorship (tyranny)
    In constitution Ch 1,2,3 (leg, ex, jud)
  9. 9Parliament structureBicameral (2 houses) except QLD
    NSW:
    Lower: Legislative Council
    Upper: Legislative Assembly
    FEDERAL:
    Lower: House of Representatives
    Upper: Senate
  10. 10Other sections of Constitution- Double dissolution power to gov gen (s57)
    - High court (s71)
    - Referendum required to change Constitution (s128)
  11. 11ATSI Customary Law1967 Referendum - ATSI given right to vote
    Circle sentencing
  12. 12State sovereignty- No nation forced to sign treaty, join UN, go to ICJ
    - Doesn't apply when jus cogens, R2P
  13. 13Sources of Int'l LawInt'l Customary Law e.g. Hague/Geneva Conventions
    Instruments (e.g. treaties, declarations, UNDRIP (2007))
    - example is Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) --> CRoC
    Legal decisions (ICJ)
    Legal writings
  14. 14UN Organs- General Assembly
    - Security Council
    - ICJ
    - Secretariat
    - Trusteeship Council
    - Economic + Social Council
  15. 15Courts and TribunalsICJ - 15 judges
    ICC - Rome Statute, crimes against humanity
    Individual tribunals e.g. ICTR (Rwandan genocide)
  16. 16IGOs- UN (193 member states)
    - EU (European Union)
    - AU (African Union)
    - Arab League
    - NATO
    - Commonwealth
  17. 17NGOs- International Committee Red Crystal (ICRC) (Red Cross) (Geneva Convention)
    - Greenpeace
    - WWF (World Wildlife Fund)
    - Amnesty Int'l (child soldiers, persecution)
    - Expose issues that need attention, less likely to be govt biased
  18. 18Int'l law and Australia- We can refer to it if we have no statute (e.g. In Mabo (No 2) 1992)
    - Family Law Act 1975 --> CRoC
    - Migration Act 1958 --> Refugee Convention
  19. 19Public Law- Criminal
    - Administrative (govt powers/decisions)
    - Constitutional
  20. 20Private law (civil)- Contract --> damages (compensation), injunction (perform/not perform)
    - Tort (e.g. negligence, trespass, false imprisonment, defamation, nuisance)
    - Property
  21. 21Civil vs Criminal court personnelCriminal:
    Prosecutor vs Defendant
    Judge and Jury
    Innocent until proven guilty
    Civil:
    Plaintiff vs Defendant
    Judge and jury if requested
    Beyond reasonable double
  22. 22Common vs Civil Law SystemsCommon:
    - custom
    - informed by precedent
    Civil:
    - codified
    - rules
  23. 23Law reform is- Changing the law (passing legislation, creating new precedent)
    - Amending existing law
    - Removing irrelevant law
  24. 24Conditions of Law Reform- Changing societal values (Anti Discrimination Act 1997 Cth)
    - New concepts of justice (death penalty)
    - New technology (DNA)
    - Failure of existing laws
    - Int'l laws/conventions
  25. 25Agencies of Law Reform- Law reform commissions (ALRC, NSWLRC)
    - Parliamentary committees (standing and select)
    - Royal commissions
    - Permanent advisory bodies (Aus Institute of Criminology)
    - Media
    - NGOs
  26. 26Mechanisms of Law Reform- Courts
    - Parliaments
    - IGOs (UN etc)
  27. 27Native Title - CAM- Terra nullius (1788)
    - Tent embassy (1972)
    - Aboriginal Land Rights Act (1976) (NT)
    - Mabo v Qld (No 2) (1992)
    - Native Title Act (1993) (Cth)
    - NT Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) / 10pt plan
  28. 28Double jeopardyConditions: New technology (DNA), inflexibility, cases unresolved
    Agencies: Media, community, police, attorney general
    Mechanisms: NSW amendment bill; R v Carroll (2002)
  29. 29Rights and ResponsibilitiesFreedom of speech --> discriminate, defame
    Right to vote --> vote responsibly
    Right to religion --> respect others
    - Moral vs legal rights
    - Express rights (religion, vote, trial by jury)
    - UDHR, Magna Carta
  30. 30UDHR Twin Covenants- ICCPR (Int'l covenant of civil + political rights) -- voting, non-arbitrary detail
    - ICESR (Int'l covenant on economic, social+cultural rights) -- food, shelter, jobs
  31. 31Law enforcement agencies- NSW Police force
    - AFP (Aus Federal Police)
    - ACC (Australian Crime Commission)
    - ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organisation)
  32. 32Dispute resolution (indv x indv)- Negotiation
    - Mediation
    - Conciliation
    - Arbitration
    - Courts + Tribunals
  33. 33Mediation vs ConciliationMediation: mediator helps process, no advice
    Conciliation: may advise both parties, can have legal reps
  34. 34Non-legal dispute resolution (indv x state)- Trade unions
    - Media (change.org)
    - Politician
    - Interest groups (Greenpeace)
  35. 35Legal dispute resolution (indv x state)- Internal Review
    - Administrative tribunal (specific admin decisions of govt agencies)
    - Judicial review
    - Ombudsman
    - Stat bodies (royal commissions, ICAC (Margaret Cunneen), AHRC)
  36. 36S&S - Legal implications/impacts- Increased accessibility + affordability
    - Protects from criminal activity e.g. espionage, terrorism
    - Increased after WWI --> threatens individual rights
    - Article 12 UDHR --> arbitrary interference
  37. 37Difficulties enforcing rights- Threatens personal rights
    - "As surveillance gets smart, hackers get smarter" - The Conversation
    - Difficult to enforce CCTV rules (how long they're kept, uploaded to internet)
  38. 38Law Reform- Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
    - Surveillance Devices Act 2004 (Cth) - limitations, how long they're stored
    - Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2014 (Cth) - number of govt agencies can access telecommunication info
    - National Security Legislation Amendment Act 2014 (Cth) - ASIO can infiltrate computer networks
  39. 39Juvenile Detention (NT)- Don Dale centre in Darwin, NT
    - "Youth workers" abusing rights
    - Children in detention in NT 3x higher
  40. 40JD Rights breached- Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC) (1990)
    - Care and Protection of Children Act 2007 (NT)
    - UDHR (1948)
  41. 41JD Non-legal responses- ABC's Four Corners July episode --> leaked footage (catalyst)
    - Nationwide outrage
    - Other news articles e.g. news.com, SMH
  42. 42JD Legal responses- M Turnbull - royal commission
    one day after the release of footage
    (hasn't happened yet)
    - NT leadership ensured it wouldn't keep happening
    - Mention 25yr royal commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody hasn't resulted in improved outcomes --> new royal commission effectiveness?
  43. 43Recreational drug use Aus- Increased availability + accessibility
    - Risk to workplace, driving, social --> changes perceptions, limits thinking + practical abilities
  44. 44Drug use laws + mechanisms- Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (Cth)
    - Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)
    - Random Breath Testing (RBT)
    - Mobile Drug Testing (MDT)
  45. 45Drug testing (workplace) objections- Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) -- bodily privacy
    - AWU -- drug testing about safety of work
    - Driving, heavy equipment, other ppl
    - 20-25% workplace accidents related to drugs
    - Urine test detects drugs weeks after use
    - Equity, imperfect
    - Test patterns of usage over impairment
  46. 46Drug testing (workplace) non legal responses- Trade unions pushing for saliva (successful in 2014 Energy Endeavour)
    - NSW RailCorp strike - want official policy
    - "Drug testing at work: wee in the cup, please" 2010 ABC --> justifiable in safety critical areas
  47. 47Drug testing (workplace) effectiveness- Curbs abuse: fear of getting caught, consequences
    - Brought issues to light --> little legislation change --> limited effectiveness
  48. 48Drug testing (driving) reasons- Good judgment, sharp concentration needed for safe driving
    - Increased usage + availability
    - Illicit driving more prevalent and mixing with drunk driving
  49. 49Drug testing (driving) Cases + Legislation- Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW)
    - Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (Cth)
    - Police v Carrall 2016 - 9 days cannabis
  50. 50Drug testing (driving) non-legal responses- Media speculation on MBT - unreliable, mysterious, 3 certain drugs, false readings, too expensive, impairment vs presence
    - Greens MP David Shoebridge - "ineffective and inaccurate"
    - Huffington Post 2016 article - deterrent factor is strongest
  51. 51Drug testing (driving) - effective vs ineffective- MDT uses saliva samples, when the drug is psychoactive
    - Positive readings go through lab tests
    - Doesn't test for impairment only presence
    - Only 3 types of drugs, not prescription
  52. 52Drug testing (sniffer dogs) positives- Deterrents for drug carriers
    - Cost of losing one life > cost of dogs
    - False readings --> ppl in contact --> scare them
  53. 53Drug testing (sniffer dogs) negatives- Average $9m spent on them each year
    - 74% searched in 2014 had no drugs
    - NSW Labor MP Jo Haylen - wrong 3/4 of time (stat from NSW Ombudsman), scare young people into overdose, LGBQT
    - Targets recreational users > drug traffickers

Information

Description
Legal Studies Flashcards on Yearlies, created by Ellie Yiasemides on 08/09/2016.
Views
0
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?