null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
42600
ECHR
Description
Undergraduate Law (Rights and Accountability) Mind Map on ECHR, created by catriona.lilley on 04/10/2013.
No tags specified
law
rights and accountability
law
rights and accountability
undergraduate
Mind Map by
catriona.lilley
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
catriona.lilley
almost 12 years ago
105
0
0
Resource summary
ECHR
Rights
General/social
Art 2- Life
Art 3- torture
Art 4- Slavery
Art 5- Liberty/Security
Art 8- privacy/family life
Art 9- thought/conscience/religion
Art 10- expression
Art 11- association/assembly
Art 12- marriage
Legal Rights
Art 6- Fair Trial
Art 7- legal certainty
Ancillary Rights
Remedy (art 13)
Non-discrimination (art 14)
State derogations (art 15)
War/Emergency
excluding some fundamental rights
A v SoSHome Sec [2004] UKHL 56
Restrictions re political activities of aliens (art 16)
Prohibition of rights abuses (art 17)
Additional Protocols
Possessions
Education
Free elections
Debt
Movement
Non-expulsion
From own state
of foreigners
Appeal
compensation for wrongful conviction
No double jeapordy
equality of spouses
No capital punishment
Types of rights/duties
Duties
Positive
Negative
Rights
absolute
Limited
qualified
State Duties
Secure rights (art 1)
Effective domestic remedy (art 3)
Access to court (art 34)
Comply with judgement (art 46)
Enforcement
Inter-State complaint
Individual Petition
Applicant must be victim
Stages
1- Apply to court
2- state enforces judgement
Admissibility
jurisdiction
violation
Domestic remedies exhausted
6 months
applicant not anon
different to case law
Not ill--founded
compatible with convention
Not abuse of right to appeal
Interpretation
Legality
any rules- general and accepted by domestic authorities
accessible
Sunday Times v UK (1979)
Foreseeable
Malone v UK (1984)
Sahin v Turkey (2007)
Proportionality
Soering v UK (1989)
Disproportionate
impairs essence of right
absolute rules
Hirst v UK (no 2) (2005)
Alternatives
Campbell v UK (1992)
Insufficient safeguards
Steel and Morris v UK (1995)
Flawed/inadequate procedural protections
Inappropriate reasons
Vogt v Germany (1996)
Margin of Appreciation
Handyside v UK (1976)
Little margin
convention standard is objective
European consensus
Goodwin v UK (2002)
Important Principles
X and Y v Netherlands (1985)
Wide Margin
controversy
Muller v Switzerland (1991)
Social policy/environment
James v UK (1986)
Hatton v UK (2003)
State Knowledge
Klass v Germany (1979-80)
Objectives of ECHR
practical/effective
dynamic
other documents
some autonomous principles
Restricting qualified rights
Arts 8-11
Is there interference with right
If Yes
accordance with law?
Legitimate aim?
Necessary in democracy?
Pressing social need
Steel and Morris v UK (2005)
Proportionate
Relevant &sufficient reasons
Smith and Grady v UK (1999)
Hirst v UK (no 2) (2005)
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Contract Law
sherhui94
How Parliament Makes Laws
harryloftus505
A-Level Law: Theft
amyclare96
AQA AS LAW, Unit 1, Section A, Parliamentary Law Making 1/3
Nerdbot98
Law Commission 1965
ria rachel
The Criminal Courts
thornamelia
A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
Jessica 'JessieB
A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
Jessica 'JessieB
Omissions
ameliathorn0325
AS Law Jury Case Quiz
Fionnghuala Malone
Criminal Law
jesusreyes88
Browse Library