Mapa mental
Attachment

Conteúdo do mapa
Attachment
Classical conditioning
- Pavlov(1927)
- learning through association
- food(UCS) - pleasure(UCR) - mum(NS) - no response - food+mum(UCS) - pleasure (UCR) - mum(CS) - pleasure(CR)
Operant conditioning
- Dollard&Miller(1950)
- hungry infant- uncomfortable- produces drive- infant fed- drive reduced- feeling of pleasure- food rewarding(PRIMARY REINFORCER)- person providing food(SECONDARY REINFORCER)
- Attachment occurs because infant seeks person who supplies reward
Evaluating learning theory
- Harlow(1959)
- Strong evidence= attachment not based solely on food
- Baby Rhesus' monkeys
- Removed from mothers and placed in cage
- 2 mothers
- Contact comfort mother- soft towelling
- Spent most time- especially when scared
- lactating mother with food+drink
- Contact comfort mother- soft towelling
- 2 mothers
- Removed from mothers and placed in cage
- Problems
- Conducted by monkeys and not by humans=extrapolation
- Ethical issues=developed abnormalities in later life
- Schaffer and Emerson(1964)
- 60 babies Glasgow
- Infants most attached to person who interacted with them the most
- 60 babies Glasgow
Bowlby's attachment theory (1958)
- Sensitive period (4-6 months)
- Caregiving is adaptive (adults innately programmed)
- Secure base (infants explore world- return when threatened)
- Monotropy and hierarchy (primary attachment figure=mum)
- Internal working model (relationship creates expectations)
- Continuity hypothesis (link= early attachment+later emotional behaviour)
- Strengths
- Evidence of monotropy in human infants
- Scahffer&Emerson(1964)
- 60 babies
- Scahffer&Emerson(1964)
- Evidence for continuity hypthesis
- Harlow(1959) -formed one way attachment with wire mother
- Difficulties in later life
- Harlow(1959) -formed one way attachment with wire mother
- Evidence of monotropy in human infants
- Weaknesses
- Rutter(1995) - disagrees with concept of monotropy
- Multiple attachment theory
- HOWEVER
- Bowlby doesn't doubt importance of secondary attachment figures but need primary for healthy development
- Prior&Glaser(2006)
- Conclude from research(meta analysis) evidence for hierarchy model
- Prior&Glaser(2006)
- Bowlby doesn't doubt importance of secondary attachment figures but need primary for healthy development
- HOWEVER
- Multiple attachment theory
- Kagen(1984) offers alternative explanation for continuity hypthesis
- The temperant (personality) hypothesis
- Infants born with different temperants
- The temperant (personality) hypothesis
- Rutter(1995) - disagrees with concept of monotropy
Strange situation
- Aim to see how infants behave under stress conditions
- 106 American middle class infants(9-18months) +mothers
- Each stage lasts around 3 minutes
- Ainsworth(1978)
Types of attachment
- Secure (type B) 66%
- Insecure avoidant (type A) 22%
- Insecure resistant (type C) 12%
- Main&Soloman(1986)
- Re analysed strange situation
- 'The disorganised type'
- Mixture of all 3
- 'The disorganised type'
- Re analysed strange situation
Reliability+Validity
- Reliability- if we repeat research and findings are the same,findings are reliable consistency
- Validity= extent to which we are measuring what we intended to measure
Imagens e arquivos do mapa
Informações
- Descrição
- A Levels Psychology Mapa Mental sobre Attachment, criado por lucyhacking em 01-12-2013.
- Criado por
- lucyhacking
- Visualizações
- 41
- Tags
- Avaliação