Foundations in Psychology - Semester 1, Lecture 1
Slides do conjunto (37)
-
- Study of the brain, human or animal behaviour & the relationship between the two
- Application of principles of biology to the study of mental processes & behaviour
- Goal - Understand the biological processes underlying psychological phenomena
- Research - How psychological factors like cognition, mood & appraisal combine with biological events like stress physiology, changes in brain function & pharmacological effects to shape human experience
- *See flow chart
-
- Study of mental processes
- Key Features:
- Main approach to experimental psychology
- - In cognitive psychology which investigates memory, language, perception & problem solving
- - Also used for other areas like social & developmental
- Emphasises active mental processes
- - The brain is seen as an information processor using the analogy of mind to computer
- - Mental processes are based on discrete modules
- Uses experimental methods as well as computer modelling & neuropsychology
-
- Working Memory
- - Central executive: controls/directs attention
- - Visuo-spatial sketchpad, phonological loop & episodic buffer
- Temporal Perception
- - Internal clock/pacemaker
- Schemas
- - Mental representation of thought/behaviour organisation
- - Activated in relevant situations
- *See flow charts
-
COGNITIVE PSYCH VS PSYCHOBIOLOGY?
- Cognitive Psychology: How does the mind do it?
- Psychobiology: How does the brain do it?
- Both can use neurons to describe mind
- Mental processes vs physical biology
-
- Early Philosophers:
- Plato (387 BC) suggested the brain was the seat of all mental processes
- Galen (AD 130-200) proposed a theory of brain function based on ventricles
- Plotinus (AD 205-270) said that the soul is separate from the body (dualistic understanding of mind & body)
-
- Descartes (1596-1650)
- - Dualism (& the mind/body problem): interested in how does physical matter
- - Mechanistic view of the body (eg. reflexes)
- - Mind does not follow the laws of nature
- - Mind & body can influence each other
- - Pineal gland as the interface between body & soul
- Debates during the 18th & early 19th centuries
- - Those who believed that brain function could be localised to particular brain regions
- - Those who believed the brain acted as a whole
-
DEBATE - EARLY-MID 19TH CENTURY
- Franz Joseph Gall (1757-1828) & Johann Spurzheim (1776-1832) developed phrenology (the idea that behaviours & characteristics could be deduced by the pattern & size of bumps on the skull
-
- Marie-Jean-Pierre Flourens (1794-1867) believed that parts of the brain had separate functions but each of these areas functioned globally as a whole
-
- Broca (1824-1888) & Wernicke (1848-1904) in the late 1800s provided strong data to support localisation of function, they identified specific areas of the brain central in the production & comprehension of speech
- Golgi (1873) discovered silver staining to identify neuron structure
-
- Father of experimental psychology
- Published 'Principles of Physiological Psychology' (1873)
- Consciousness - analysis of the subjective experience of the mind
-
- Opened first psychology laboratory in Leipzig, Germany (1879)
-
- Scientific techniques to isolate subtle processes
-
- Systematic & controlled study of memory in laboratory
- Devised methods to measure memory & the speed with which forgetting occurred
-
- Forgetting & learning curves
-
EARLY 20TH CENTURY ADVANCEMENTS
- Growing evidence for localisation in the early 20th century, direct evidence from motor & sensory maps in the brain from early work of Wilder Penfield
- Stimulating the temporal lobes could elicit meaningful integrated responses
-
- Physical basis of memory, an 'engram'
-
- Karl Lashley (1950)
- - Searched for the engram, the physical location of a memory
- - Trained rats to solve maze then cut out pieces of their cortex & re-tested their memory of the maze
- - Partial memory retained
-
- Behaviourism dominant until the late 1950s, B. F. Skinner
- Scientific approach
-
- All our actions are the consequence of the response, reinforcement relationship
-
- Including 'Verbal Behaviour' (1957)
-
- Chomsky's (1959) critique of 'Verbal Behaviour' is that it doesn't account for child sentence creation & an innate ability must exist
-
- Bartlett (1886-1969), Piaget (1896-1980) & Lewin (1890-1947), early pioneers
-
- WII shifted the need to look at cognitive skills
-
- 1950s technological improvements gave a theoretical (information processing) as well as methodological boost
-
- Studies software but not hardware of the brain
-
- Psychobiology + Cognition = Cognitive Neuroscience
- Study of the neurological basis of cognitive processing
- Concerned with the scientific study of biological substrates underlying cognition with a specific focus on the neural substrates of mental processes
- It addresses the questions of how psychological/cognitive functions are produced by neural circuits in the brain
- Computational neuroscience - detailed simulation of neuronal mechanisms
-
- It's important to know how the brain works & how it affects our behaviours
-
- Implications for many areas of psychology, abnormal psychology, developmental psychology, forensic & investigative psychology, HCI, etc.
-
- EEG's (electroencephalogram's) & ERP's (event related potentials)
- TMS (transcranial magnetic simulator) - a magnetic pulse applied to a brain region to 'switch it off'
-
- CAT (computerised axial tomography) - series of multiple x-rays
-
- PET (positron emission tomography) - radioactive tracer introduced to body & traced
-
- fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) - measurement of blood flow through brain regions
-
- Methods of Investigation
- Experimental methods - lab studies
- Simulations
-
- Case studies on acquired & developmental deficits
-
LANGUAGE & CONNECTIONIST MODELS
- Overview
- The acquisition of the past-tense of verbs in English - over-regularisations & the U-shaped profile of learning
- Computational model 1 - the symbolic model of the past tense learning
-
- Brief introduction to connectionist or neural network models
-
- Computational model 2 - a connectionist neural network model of the past tense learning
-
- To form the past tense of regular verbs, -ed is added
- The past tense of irregular verbs is not formed by adding -ed
- When children add the -ed at the end of an irregular word, they are producing 'over-regularisations'
-
- Some authors claim that these over-regularisations provide evidence that children are learning rules
-
IRREGULAR VERBS - KUCZAJ (1977)
- There are about 150-180 irregular verbs that can be classified into 5 different categories
- - Internal vowel change
- - Internal vowel change & addition of a final dental consonant
- - The final consonant is changed to a dental consonant
- - No change
- - Total change
-
- At an early age, children produce correct forms of past tense for both regular & irregular verbs
- When children are about 3/4 years old, they start producing over-regularisation errors of the type 'go-ed' & 'went-ed'
-
- At a later age, children produce correct forms of past tense for both regular & irregular verbs
-
- This is called the U-shaped profile of learning
-
- Computational Model 1 = The Symbolic Model of the Past Tense Learning
- Symbolic Model: Dual-Route Model
- Two mechanisms
- - A memory storage device containing the past tense of irregular forms
- - A rule-based system that adds the '-ed' form to the stem of a regular verb to form the past tense
- *See flow charts
-
- Two mechanism
- - A memory storage device containing the past tense of irregular forms
- - A rule-based system that adds the '-ed' form to the stem of a regular verb to form the past tense
- Explanation of development
- - At the beginning, all past tense verbs are stored in the memory storage device
- - The beginning of over-generalisation is explained by the interference of the two mechanisms
- - With time & practice, the two mechanisms discover the correct division of verbs into regulars & irregulars
-
THE SYMBOLIC MODEL & POSITIVES
- Evidence
- Normally developing children make mistakes on irregular forms only
- Frequent irregular verbs are also less likely to be over-regularised
- Specific Language Impairment vs Williams Syndrome (Pinker, 1994)
- - Individuals with SLI make mistakes on the irregular verb by over-regularising them
- - Individuals with Williams Syndrome have only a memory storage that stores both the regular & irregular verbs
- This dual architecture is innate
- It can account for the U-shaped profile of development
- Takes into account why some irregular verbs are more likely to be over-regularised
-
- Limitations
- The model does not tell us how children learn the '-ed' rule
- Kuczaj (1977) indicated that irregular verbs could be classified into 5 different categories depending on the type of rules that lead to the formation of the irregular past tense
- Cross-linguistic variations
- - In Arabic, the regular form of plural constitutes less than 20% of the plurals in the language
- - Norwegian has 2 ways of forming the past tense in regular verbs (add '-te'/'-ede'), plus 100 irregulars
- - Both mean it is very difficult for children
-
- Also called neural network models
- Altman (1997) compares a neuron to the structure of a sunflower
-
- Main Characteristics
- Characteristic 1
- Neurons send impulses to the other neurons to which they are connected
- The rate at which impulses are sent corresponds to the 'strength' of the signal
- Characteristic 2
- The impulse from one neuron can either
- make it more likely that another neuron will become active & pass on the activation (excitatory) or less likely that another neuron will become active (inhibitory)
- Characteristic 3
- The connections from one neuron to other neurons can change in response to the surrounding activity
-
- Excitatory Postsynaptic Potential (EPSP) = may trigger a new action potential by depolarising the neuron
- Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potential (IPSP) = may inhibit a new action potential by hyper-polarising the neuron
-
- Summation (things added together) of the postsynaptic potentials determine whether a postsynaptic will fire
-
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THIS MODEL
- Connectionist/neural network models are computer models that try to simulate how the neurons in the brain communicate & learn
- These computer neurons are much simpler than real ones
- The computer allocates a number to a neuron to indicate how active each neuron is, this is similar to the activation of a real neuron
- An algorithm calculates how active a neuron is, which will depend on how many neurons connected to it are activated & the strength of that activation
- The connection strength between two neurons is a number
- If the number is positive, then it is an excitatory connection, however if the number is negative, then it is an inhibitory connection
-
MORE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THIS MODEL
- These models offer an alternative to the rule-based accounts of the inflectional system
-
- The architecture of the connectionist models is not innate
-
- Using the same principles as the Behaviourist perspective, connectionist models learn from the environment
-
- Connectionist/Neural Network Model of the Past Tense Learning
- Plunkett & Marchman (1993-1996)
- This is a network that tries to explain the past learning & processing of the past tense of verbs in English
- Architecture of the 'feed-forward network' with 20 input units, 30 hidden units & 20 output units
-
PLUNKETT & MARCHMAN (1993-1996)
- The aim of the network is to find the right set of connections between the neurons that will activate '-ed' when a regular verb is presented (excitatory) but will switch them off when an irregular verb is presented (inhibitory)
-
- During training, it is likely that there would be temporary patterns of interference between the right connection for the regular verbs & the right ones for the irregular verbs, this leads to over-regularisation errors
-
PLUNKETT & MARCHMAN (1993-1996)
- Learning
- Initially, the model learned the past tense of 10 regular & 10 irregular verb stems which reflects the current estimates of the balance between regular & irregular verbs in children's early vocabularies
- After that, the vocabulary was increased to mimic gradual uptake of verbs by children
- The network saw a total of 500 verbs, 90% of these being regular & verbs introduced early in training had a higher frequency
- The output pattern is compared to a teacher signal which specifies the correct past tense form of the current verb
-
PLUNKETT & MARCHMAN (1993-1996)
- At the beginning, there are no errors
- The overall rate of over-regularisation errors is between 5% & 10%
- Over-regularisation recurs throughout the training period, they are not restricted to a particular stage of development
- Over-regularisation of high frequent irregular verbs is very rare
- The phonological properties of some irregular verbs seem to block over-regularisation
- A very small number of irregularisation errors are observed
-
PLUNKETT & MARCHMAN (1993-1996)
- Evidence
- The pattern of behaviour of the network is similar to the data found by Marcus et al (1992) when they studied the spontaneous speech of 83 English-speaking children
- The network demonstrates that we can simulate patterns of regular & irregular verbs without the need for an innate architecture
-
- Over-regularisation errors are not observed until the vocabulary size reaches around 120 verbs
-
- While the network has been exposed to less than 50 verbs, it treats each novel verb stem unsystematically as the net still hasn't extracted a 'representation'
- When the vocabulary expands from 50 to 120 verbs, the performance of the network improves by around 70%, there seems to be a critical period where the network moves from a 'rote representation' to a more systematic 'rule representation'
-
- The number of regular verbs during training is crucial for the success of the network
Informações
- Descrição
- Introduction to Psychobiology & Cognition
- Criado por
- Beth Cavanagh · mar 2019
- Atualizado
- 11 mar 2019
- Visualizações
- 69
- Tags
- Avaliação