Notizen
Research Methods
Inhalt der Notizen (8)
Seite 1
Definitions
Key term definitions for the Research Methods topic
Hypothesis
A prediction about the outcome of a study based on the theory being tested
Independent Variable (IV)
The variable being directly manipulated by the researcher in order to examine its effects
Dependent Variable (DV)
The variable being measured in a study - the outcome of the study
Operationalisation
Making the variables in an investigation detailed and specific so they can be measured
Alternative Hypothesis
A testable statement of the difference between the conditions in an experiment. It describes how the IV will affect the DV
Null Hypothesis
A statement which states that the difference suggested in the alternative hypothesis will not happen
Non-Directional Hypothesis
When a hypothesis does not state a direction but simply says that one factor affects another or that there will be a difference between two sets of scores
Directional Hypothesis
When a hypothesis predicts the direction of the results
Individual Differences
The variation or deviations among individuals in regard to a single characteristic or number of characteristics
Order Effects
When the positioning of tasks in an experiment influences the outcome
Demand Characteristics
When participants change their behaviour based on their perceived outcomes of a study
Investigator Effects
When a researcher unintentionally gives a participant clues, changing their behaviour
Extraneous Variable
Factors other than the IV that may affect the DV
Situational Variable
Variables that are present in the environment of the investigation/study - if they vary between conditions, they can affect the results of a study
Participant Variables
Variables that are associated with the individual participants of a study that could affect the results of the study
Confounding Variable
An extraneous variable that is not controlled and thus has an effect on the outcome of a study
Target Population
The group of people being investigated in a study
Sample
A selection of the target population that is directly studied in an investigation
Sampling Method
A technique used to gather a representative group of people as a sample from the target population
Random Sampling Method
A technique used to father a random sample of participants from the target population
Stratified Sampling Method
A technique that ensures subgroups of the target population are proportionately represented in a sample
Volunteer Sampling Method
A technique that asks for participants by placing an advert for volunteers
Opportunity Sampling Method
A technique that recruits participants who are readily available at the time
Generalisability
The extent to which the results of a study represent the whole population, not just the sample used
Biased Sample
When the sample recruited is made up of a particular type of person, which may not reflect the target population
Sample Error
When a sample differs in qualities from the target population it intends to represent
Ethical Issues
Researchers must follow codes of conduct when carrying out research to protect participants from harm
Informed Consent
Agreement of participants to take part once they are fully aware of the aims, nature, and intended outcome of a study
Deception
Misleading or lying to participants
Confidentiality
Not disclosing the identity of participants
Debriefing
After an investigation, participants are given full disclosure of the study
Right To Withdraw
Participants should be aware that they have the right to withdraw from the study at any point, including for an agreed time after the study is complete
Protection Of Participants from Physical and Psychological Harm
Safeguarding participants from physical and psychological harm
Respect
Researchers have a moral duty to respect participant's individual and cultural differences. They should inform participants of the nature of the study, offer them the right to withdraw at any time, protect them from harm, take care not to intrude on their privacy, and safeguard their details.
Integrity
Psychologists are duty bound to conduct well-designed research and not claim any misleading findings
Responsibility
Psychologists must produce beneficial findings that can be used by communities and offer value to organisations
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Participants shouldn't be placed in any situation that they wouldn't ordinarily encounter. However, if the benefit of the research outweighs the cost to participants, psychologists should safeguard participants and minimise risk of harm as much as possible.
Seite 2
Operationalising Variables
It is very important to operationalise the variables to be studied, otherwise the researcher will not know what they are looking for and this can reduce the validity and reliability of their data.
Operationalising Different Variables
Speed
Miles Per Hour - use a speedometer
Time taken to travel a specific distance - Stopwatch
Speed Trap
Speed Camera
Memory
Words recalled in a specific amount of time (word recall test)
Digit span test
Aggression
Survey
Carry out an observation
Questionnaire
Rating scale
Seite 3
Hypotheses
Every research study has a null hypothesis and an alternative/experimental hypothesis. These are statements of predicted outcomes based on the theory being tested. If the study is an experiment, then we would have a null hypothesis and an experimental hypothesis. If the study uses a non-experimental method then we would have a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis.
Examples of How to Write Hypotheses in a Standardised Format
Null
There will be no significant difference in the number of digits recalled by participants who listened to classical music and participants who listened to jazz music.
Non-Directional (Two-tailed) Experimental
There will be a significant difference in the number of digits recalled by participants who listened to classical music and participants who listened to jazz music.
Directional (One-Tailed) Experimental
Participants who listened to classical music will recall significantly more digits than participants who listened to jazz music.
Non-Directional (Two-Tailed) Alternative
There will be a significant correlation between time spent revising and percentage score on a test.
Directional (One-Tailed) Alternative
There will be a significant positive correlation between time spent revising and percentage score on a test.
Null (For a Correlation Study)
There will be no significant correlation between the time spent revising and percentage score on a test.
Seite 4
Experimental Design
Once the researcher has chosen the experimental method which best suits the nature of the study, they then have to choose what type of design will have.
Repeated Measures - Using the same participants in all conditions of a study
Strengths
Fewer participants needed, making it more economical
No individual differences between conditions of the study
Weaknesses
Demand characteristics are more likely as participants are more likely to guess the aim
Order effects may affect results
Independent Groups - Participants are split into groups and are tested in only one condition
Strengths
No order effects as participants only take part in one condition of the study
Weaknesses
More participants needed than repeated measures
May be individual differences between the groups
Matched Pairs - Using different participants in each condition of the study, but matching them for likeness on important characteristics for the study
Strengths
Fair comparisons can be made between the groups as they are equally matched
Weaknesses
Time consuming to match participants
Not all characteristics can be equally matched
Seite 5
Extraneous Variables
Once a psychologist has decided on an experimental design, they must then consider factors which may affect the participants in these designs and in the experiment method in general. These factors are known as extraneous variables. There are two types of extraneous variable.
Situational Variables - Variables that are present in the environment of the investigation/study; if they vary between conditions, they can affect the results of a study
Examples
Noise
Light Levels
Distractions
Temperature
Participant Variables - Variables that are associated with the individual participants of a study that could affect the results of a study
Examples
Personality Type
Physical Ability
Memory Ability
Substance Tolerance
What is the difference between extraneous and confounding variables?
Extraneous variables are extra variables that are not the IV, but may still have an effect on the outcome of a study, and so must be controlled. If an extraneous is not controlled, and thus has an effect on the outcome of a study, it becomes a confounding variable - this is because it confounds (damages) the results.
Controlling Extraneous Variables
There are three ways to control extraneous variables:
Random Allocation - Might involve picking names out of a hat to ensure that everyone has an equal chance of being put in each group
Could be used to control extraneous variables such as age
Standardised Procedure - Ensuring that everyone takes part in the same situation
Could be used to control extraneous variables such as time of day
Counterbalancing - Having one half of the participants take part in Condition A first, and the other half taking part in Condition B first, then swapping them over
Used to control order effects
Seite 6
Demand Characteristics & Investigator Effects
There are other types of extraneous variables that are known as demand characteristics and investigator effects.
Demand Characteristics - When a participant alters their behaviour to meet the perceived aims of the investigation
Example
For example, if participants were told a study was aimed at measuring their aggressive behaviour then they could change their behaviour to be more or less aggressive than usual
How To Control
Single Blind Technique - Information about the study is withheld from the participants
Investigator Effects - When a researcher unintentionally gives a participant clues, changing their behaviour
Example
For example, in an experiment where some participants are given a placebo and others a real drug, a researcher might treat the participants differently if they knew who was in each group
How To Control
Double Blind Technique - The aims of the study are withheld from both the participants and the researchers
Seite 7
Sampling
When we carry out research, we need people to take part. These are called participants.
The target population is the group of people from whom the sample is drawn.
It is not usually possible to test everyone in the target population so therefore psychologists use sampling techniques to choose people who are representative of the population as a whole.
If your sample is representative then you can generalise the results of your study to the wider population.
Random Sampling - A sample in which every member of the target population has an equal chance of being chosen. This involves identifying everyone in the target population and then selecting the number of participants you need in a way that gives everyone in the population an equal chance of being picked.
Strengths
Everyone has an equal chance of being chosen
Helps control extraneous participant variables
Weaknesses
Most likely won't be representative
People could refuse to take part which would lead to a less representative sample
Stratified Sampling - Classifying the target population into categories and then choosing a random sample which consists of participants from each category in the same proportions as they are in the population.
Strengths
Useful if a small population of the target population may be missed out by random sampling
Ensures that the sample is completely representative
Weaknesses
Time consuming
People may still refuse to take part, leading to a sample error which can lead to invalid conclusions being drawn about the target population
Volunteer Sampling - Participants become part of a study because they volunteer in response to an advert in a newspaper or on a noticeboard
Strengths
Researcher doesn't need to do much
Possible to recruit from a target population by placing the advert in a specific location
Most ethical method as it avoids placing pressure on people to participate
Weaknesses
Less representative than random/stratified as not everyone will see the advert or want to respond
Could be a biased sample as volunteers tend to have a particular type of personality
May mean that the findings are unreliable
Opportunity Sampling - Taking the sample from people who are available at the time that the study is carried out and fit the criteria being looked for
Strengths
Quickest and simplest sampling method
Weaknesses
Can lead to a biased sample as not every member of the target population may be around at the time of the study
Findings most likely won't be generalisable to the whole target population
Seite 8
Ethics
The Code of Ethics and Conduct of the British Psychological Society underpins the activities of all practising psychologists. Whenever any research is carried out it must be ethical.
Ethical Issues - Researchers follow codes of conduct when carrying out research to protect participants form harm
Informed Consent - Agreement of participants to take part once they are fully aware of the aims, nature, and intended outcome of a study
Why is it an issue? Why is it a problem for participants?
Sometimes research has to be conducted without consent (i.e. observing the everyday behaviour of people in public places)
Participants should be aware of what they are doing
How can it be dealt with? What can the researcher do to minimise the impact on the participant?
The researcher should be sensitive to issues of privacy and cultural beliefs
Have participants sign a consent form
Deception - Misleading or lying to participants
Why is it an issue? Why is it a problem for participants?
Violates a participant's ability to give informed consent
How can it be dealt with? What can the researcher do to minimise the impact on the participant?
Have a debrief, where the aims and intended outcomes are fully disclosed
Confidentiality - Not disclosing the identity of participants
Why is it an issue? Why is it a problem for participants?
So that the researcher cannot identify the participants
So the participant's personal details are not leaked
How can it be dealt with? What can the researcher do to minimise the impact on the participant?
Destroy all participant information after the study is complete
Debriefing - After an investigation, participants are given full disclosure of the study
Why is it an issue? Why is it a problem for participants?
Participants have a right to know the aims of a study
How can it be dealt with? What can the researcher do to minimise the impact on the participant?
Give the participants full disclosure of the study when it is over
Right To Withdraw - Participants should be aware that they have the right to withdraw from the study at any point, including for an agreed time after the study is complete
Why is it an issue? Why is it a problem for participants?
Participants have the right to withdraw at any time
How can it be dealt with? What can the researcher do to minimise the impact on the participant?
Make sure participants are aware of this right
Protection From Harm - Safeguarding participants form physical and psychological harm
Why is it an issue? Why is it a problem for participants?
Psychological harm is quite subjective
It is dangerous to expose participants to harm
How can it be dealt with? What can the researcher do to minimise the impact on the participant?
Consider how each participant may feel from their point of view
The BPS Code of Human Research Ethics is based on 4 key principles.
Respect - Researchers have a moral duty to respect participant's individual and cultural differences. They should inform participants of the nature of the study, offer them the right to withdraw at any time, protect them from harm, take care not to intrude on their privacy, and safeguard their details.
Integrity - Psychologists are duty bound to conduct well-designed research and not claim any misleading findings
Responsibility - Psychologists must produce beneficial findings that can be used by communities and offer value to organisations
Cost-Benefit Analysis - Participants shouldn't be placed in any situation that they wouldn't ordinarily encounter. However, if the benefit of the research outweighs the cost to participants, psychologists should safeguard participants and minimise risk of harm as much as possible.
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- GCSE Psychology (Research Methods) Notiz am Research Methods, erstellt von Kieya Mistry am 02/12/2017.
- Erstellt von
- Kieya Mistry · Dez 2017
- Aktualisiert
- 2 Dez 2017
- Aufrufe
- 13
- Bewertung
Mehr zu Hypotheses and Variables