¡GoConqr estrena diseño! Cuéntanos qué te parece.

Fichas

Memory

Emma KEMP Psychology A level Inglés 54 fichas

Memory

Fichas del conjunto (54)

  1. 1Sensory registerTemporarily stores information from our senses
    Has a limited capacity and a very limited duration (will spontaneously decay unless we pay attention to it)
    Information is coded depending on the sense that has picked it up
  2. 2Short-term memoryHas a limited capacity and a limited duration
    Coding is usually acoustic
  3. 3Long-term memoryHas almost unlimited capacity and is theoretically permanent in duration
    Coding is usually semantic
    Consists of episodic memory, semantic memory and procedural memory
  4. 4Episodic memoryStores information about events that you've actually experienced
    The memories are declarative, meaning they can be consciously recalled
  5. 5Semantic memoryStores facts and knowledge
    Can be consciously recalled
  6. 6Procedural memoryStores the knowledge of how to do things, such as walking
    Cannot be consciously recalled
  7. 7Sperling (1960)After participants were shown a grid with three rows of four letters for 0.05 seconds and asked to recall either the whole grid or a certain row (indicated by a tone), those recalling the whole grid managed 4 or 5 letters on average and those recalling a row managed 3 letters on average (no matter the row), suggesting the whole grid was in their sensory register but the trace faded before recall ended
  8. 8Evaluation of Sperling's (1960) studyGood control of variables
    Replicable
    Bad ecological validity
  9. 9Peterson and Peterson (1959)Participants were shown nonsense trigrams and asked to recall them after 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds while they has to count backwards in threes from a given number during the pause
    After 3 seconds, recall was correct 80% of the time whereas only about 10% was recalled correctly after 18 seconds
  10. 10Evaluation of Peterson and Peterson's (1960) studyGood control of variables
    Lack of ecological validity
    Participants could have gotten confused due to repeats where they saw different trigrams
  11. 11Bahrick et al. (1975)392 people were asked to complete free-recall, photo recognition and name recognition tests for their ex-classmates periodically through their life
    Within 15 years of leaving school, free-recall was 60% accurate and photo and name recognition was 90% accurate
    After 30 years, free recall had declined to about 30% accuracy
    After 48 years, name recognition was about 80% accurate and photo recognition was about 40% accurate
  12. 12Evaluation of Bahrick et al.'s (1975) studyHigh ecological validity (it was a field study)
    Hard to control variables, such as amount of rehearsal
  13. 13Jacobs (1887)Participants were asked to recall a string of letters and digits and the length of the sequence increased until it was recalled wrong
    On average, participants recalled 9 digits and about 7 letters but the capacity increased with age during childhood
  14. 14Evaluation of Jacobs' (1887) studyLack of ecological validity
    Participants could have been confused by previous sequences during repeats
  15. 15Miller (1956)Said the capacity of STM is 7 ± 2 items
    Suggested chunking can increase the capacity
  16. 16Baddeley (1966)Participants were asked to recall a set of words either immediately or after a ten minute task where the set of words was either acoustically similar or dissimilar or semantically similar or dissimilar
    Those recalling immediately struggled with acoustically similar words whereas those recalling from the LTM struggled with semantically similar words
  17. 17Evaluation of Baddeley's (1966) studyLack of ecological validity
    Doesn't consider the types of LTM and other types of coding
  18. 18Atkinson and Shiffrin's (1968) multi-store model of memoryAtkinson and Shiffrin's (1968) multi-store model of memory
  19. 19Evaluation of Atkinson and Shiffrin's (1968) multi-store model of memorySupported by studies
    Oversimplified
  20. 20Primacy effectPeople are able to recall the first few items from a list better than those from the middle (because they'll have been rehearsed better and transferred to LTM)
  21. 21Recency effectPeople tend to recall items from the end of a list better than those from the middle (because the middle words have been displaced)
  22. 22Milner et al. (1957) - Patient HMHad his hippocampus removed to treat epilepsy and found he could then only form new short-term memories rather than new long-term memories as well
  23. 23Baddeley and Hitch's (1974) working memory modelBaddeley and Hitch's (1974) working memory model
  24. 24Central executiveCan be described as attention
    Has a limited capacity and controls 'slave' systems that also have a limited capacity
  25. 25Phonological loopHolds speech-based information
    Made up of a phonological store (inner ear) and an articulatory process (inner voice)
  26. 26Visuo-spatial sketchpadDeals with temporary storage of visual and spatial information
  27. 27Episodic bufferStores information from the other subsystems and integrates it together to make complete scenes
  28. 28Shallice and Warrington (1974) - Patient KFHe had an impaired STM due to brain damage but his issue was only with immediate recall of words presented verbally rather than with visual information
  29. 29Evaluation of Baddeley and Hitch's (1974) working memory modelHas support from studies
    The idea of the central executive is oversimplified
    Doesn't explain how information is transferred to LTM
    Experimental support typically lacks ecological validity
  30. 30DisplacementWhen information is pushed out of the memory
    Occurs in STM
  31. 31DecayWhen information fades away
    Occurs in STM and LTM
  32. 32Retrieval failureWhen information still exists in the memory but isn't accessible due to an absence of appropriate cues
    Occurs in LTM
  33. 33Retroactive interferenceWhere new information interferes with the ability to recall older information
    Occurs in LTM
  34. 34Underwood and Postman (1960)Participants were given a list of paired words (e.g. cat-tree) and then later given a second list with the first word of the pair the same (e.g. cat-dirt)
    They were asked to recall the first list and their performance was worse than a control group who didn't have to learn a second list
  35. 35Proactive interferenceWhere older information interferes with the ability to recall new information
    Occurs in LTM
  36. 36Underwood (1957)Studies into forgetting over a 24 hour period showed that if people has learnt 15 or more word lists, their recall for the last list a day later was around 20% but if they had only learned the last list, recall a day later was around 80%
  37. 37Cue-dependent memorySomething that can be either internal (e.g. mood) or external (e.g. context) that sparks recall
  38. 38Tulving and Psotka (1971)Found that free cued recall was about 70% no matter the amount of lists of 24 words (between 1 and 6) a participant had whereas those who completed total free recall showed evidence of retroactive interference because participants with less lists performed better
  39. 39Evaluation of Tulving and Psotka's (1971) studyGood control of variables
    Lack of ecological validity
  40. 40Leading questionA certain answer is implied within the question
  41. 41Loftus and Palmer (1974)The verb within the question "how fast do you think the cars were going when they __?" is a key to the testimony given
    The verb used was one of hit, smashed, collided, bumped or contacted
    When the given word was smashed the highest estimate was given of 41mph and the lowest estimate of 32mph was given when the word contacted was used
  42. 42Loftus and Zanni (1975)Participants were shown a film of a car crash and then asked whether they saw "the" broken headlight or "a" broken headlight
    17% of the group with the word "the" said they did compared to only 7% in the other group, suggesting even the smallest words can make a question leading and affect EWT
  43. 43Evaluation of Loftus and Palmer's (1974) studyHelpful implications in police interviews
    The experiment was artificial so might not be accurate
    Potential demand characteristics
  44. 44Evaluation of Loftus and Zanni's (1975) studyHelpful implications in police interviews
    Good control of variables
    Lack of ecological validity
  45. 45Shaw et al. (1997)A pairing of a participant and a confederate watched a staged robbery and were then interviewed together afterwards
    If the participant responded first, recall was 58% accurate
    If the confederate answered first and gave accurate responses, the participants recall was accurate 67% of the time
    If the confederate responded first and gave inaccurate answers, the participants recall was 42% accurate
  46. 46Post-event discussionA conversation between co-witnesses or an interviewer and an eyewitness after a crime has taken place which may contaminate a witness' memory for the event
  47. 47Valentine and Coxon (1997)3 groups of participants (children, young adults and the elderly) watched a video of a kidnapping and then asked a series of leading and non-leading questions about what they'd seen
    Both the elderly and children gave more incorrect answers to non-leading questions
    Children were misled more by leading questions that adults or the elderly
  48. 48Evaluation of Valentine and Coxon's (1997) studyGood implications in law
    Lacks ecological validity
  49. 49Yerkes-Dodson curveA graph that suggests that optimal performance occurs when the levels of anxiety and stress are neither low nor highYerkes-Dodson curve
  50. 50Johnson and Scott (1976)Participants were asked to identify a man from 50 photographs
    Those in condition 1 (when the man came out after an argument with a pen and greasy hands) were 49% accurate
    Those in condition 2 (when the man came out with a knife and bloody hands) were 33% accurate
  51. 51Evaluation of Johnson and Scott's (1976) studyHigh ecological validity
    Ethics: deception, informed consent
  52. 52Cognitive interview technique1) The interviewer makes the witness relaxed and tailors his/her language to suit them
    2) The witness mentally recreates the environmental and internal context
    3) The witness reports everything
    4) The witness is asked to recall details in a different order
    5) The witness is asked to recall details from a different perspective
    6) The interview avoids any judgement
  53. 53Geiselman et al. (1986)Participants were questioned about a classroom robbery 2 days after it had happened either using the cognitive interview or standard interview
    Early in the questioning, everyone was asked "was the guy with the green backpack nervous?" even though the perpetrator had a blue backpack
    Later, the participants were asked to recall what colour the backpack was and those in the cognitive interview condition were less likely to recall the backpack as green
  54. 54Evaluation of Geiselman et al.'s (1986) studyHigh ecological validity
    Didn't account for individual differences

Información

Descripción
A level Psychology Fichas sobre Memory, creado por Emma KEMP el 06/03/2020.
Creado por
Emma KEMP
Visitas
0
Valoración

Escríbenos

¿Sobre qué es tu mensaje?

¿Qué te parece el nuevo diseño?

¿Te gusta?