Fichas
Research Methods
Fichas del conjunto (39)
- 1How can you improve reliablity? (KEY WORD CONSISTENCY)-pilot studies, standardisation (a standard way all researchers should collect data) test retest - inter rater reliability
- 2How can you improve reliablity? (KEY WORD CONSISTENCY)-pilot studies, standardisation (a standard way all researchers should collect data) test retest - inter rater reliability
- 3what is internal reliability?The extent to which there is consistency, different parts should give consistent results e.g. all IQ questions should be the same difficulty
- 4What is external reliability?The extent which there is a measure of something consistent over time e.g. test re test (doing it at a later time and making sure results are consistent)
- 5what is internal validity?the extent to which the changing of the IV is entirely relibale for the DV, there are no extraneous variables
- 6what is external validity?The extent to which things can be generalised to toehr people times and situations e.g. lab experiemnts are low as they are not natural
- 7How can you improve validity?control extraneous variables. avoid demand characteristics (single blind techniques like the placebo effect)
- 8What are the 5 types of graph?-bar chart (N/O)
-histogram (I/R)
-frequency polygon (I/R)
-line graph
-scatter graph (correlation) - 9list the measures of central tendencynominal - mode
ordinal -median
interval/ratio - mean - 10what is p<0.01 significance?99% sure results are accurate. There is a real effect. Used more for drug studies as the need to be accurate
- 11what is p<0.05 significance?we are 95% sure that it is a real effect. Used for most studies
- 12What is a type 1 error?Where the null hypothesis is rejected wrongly
when the significance level is too high
(incorrectly saying that it was not due to chance, when really with a lower significance it would be chance) - 13What is a type 2 errorWhen the null hypothesis is accepted wrongly (saying it is due to chance when its not) as the significance is too low
- 14What are the problems that can occur with peer review?- unachieveable ideal, cannot find someone to check it so bad research gets passed on -people could bury rival research -publication bias (prove their own research) Preserving the status quo (supports other studies)
- 15What are the advantages of lab experiments?-specialised equipment
-cause and effect
-easily replicated - 16what are the disadvantages of lab experiments-low ecological validity
-demand characteristics - 17What are the advantages of field experiments?-high ecological validity
-lower demand characteristics - 18what are the disadvantages of field experiments?-control is not always maintained
-equipment not pratical - 19What is the advantage of a natural experiment?No/few demand characteristics
- 20What are the disadvantages of natural experiments?-low control
-cannot establish cause and effect
-time consuming - 21what are the advantages and disadvantages of correlations?;-( cannot determine cause an effect due to extraneous variables ;-) shows a realtionships which can strenghten research and theories
- 22What are the advantages of surveys?- can approach sensitive topics
-sent them out to many people cheaply and quickly
lots of data both quantitative qualitative - 23what are the disadvantages of surveys?-if badly worded they can be leading
-very low response rate (33%)
-demand characteristics - 24what are the three types of interviews?structured- pre set list of questions
unstructured - an idea but no prepared questions
semi structured- some questions but may aske more depending upon the response - 25What are the positives of structured interviews?-less likely to deviate
-easier data analysis
-easy to generalise
-less training needed - 26What are the negatives of structured interviews?-lack of validity (v formal)
-no further questions
-demand characteristics and social desirability bias - 27evaluation of unstructured interview:-) better validity, speak openly, detailed info, flexible
:-( difficult to analyse, training for interviewer needed, harder - 28evaluation of semi structured interview?:-) qualitiative data, keep focus but still gather more data
:-( training needed, time, effort and money, social desirability bias - 29case studies- focusing on one individual or a group of people using different research methods to attain data:-) lots of data obtained which will be indepth (ideographic)
-can use case studies to challenge exisiting theories
:-( bias, reterospective, narrow study, unable to generalise - 30pilot study - a practice attempt before the real study to find if there is any problems with the upcoming experiment:-)useful knowledge about how the task should be completed, eliminates any faults and save wasting money
:-( p's may act different, p's may sabotage the research to provide false falts - 31what are the 4 types of sampling?-opportunity
-volunteer
-random
-stratified (equal ratio) - 32Evaluation of independent groups (different people in different conditions):-) no order effects, reduce demand characterisitcs
:-( expensive, individual differences, hard to compare - 33Evaluation of Repeated measures:-) fewer participants, compare without individual diff
:-( order effects, need to introduce counterbalancing - 34evaluation of matched pairs:-) increase validity, decrease individual diff, low order effects
:-( people are not 100% similar
time consuming and often difficult - 35what is counterbalancing?A way of reducing order effects by giving different groups the same conditions but in different orders (so one condition isn't overly suceptable to demand characterstics)
- 36what are the 4 types of data?Nominal (categories)
Ranked - Ordinal (order diff scores)
Ratio ( equal untis absolute 0 e.g. speed)
interval (equal units can go negative) - 37What the Mnemonic for statistical testNormal cats can't swim in milky water
N-nominal C-chi squared C-correlational S-Spearman's Rho I-independent groups M-Mann Whitney W-Wilcoxen (repeated measures) - 38What is peer review?It is an important part of the process of publishing work. A peer (another psychologist in the same field) checks your experiment to ensure it is valid and credible, it can also judge design and methodology and significance
- 39What can peer reviews achieve?-allocation of funding (is it worthwile to fund?) -publication of research in specific journals or books (share research) - Assesing the research ration of university departments
Información
- Descripción
- Psychology Fichas sobre Research Methods, creado por lele_star el 23/05/2013.
- Creado por
- lele_star · may 2013
- Actualizado
- 19 feb 2016
- Visitas
- 49
- Etiquetas
- Valoración