Sexual Selection and Human Reproduction

Description

A-Level Psychology (Printed) Mind Map on Sexual Selection and Human Reproduction, created by Sophie Edroff on 11/23/2015.
Sophie Edroff
Mind Map by Sophie Edroff, updated more than 1 year ago
Sophie Edroff
Created by Sophie Edroff over 10 years ago
3
1

Resource summary

Sexual Selection and Human Reproduction
  1. A01
    1. Intrasexual Selection
      1. members of one sex compete with each other for access to member of the opposite sex. Victors are able to mate and pass on their genes.
      2. Intersexual Selection
        1. the preferences of one sex for members of the opposite sex who possess certain qualities. The preferences of one sex determine the areas in which the other sexes must compete.
          1. Humans are perceptually 'pre-programmed' to attend to displays off these important indicators which in turn increases their willingness to mate with individual who possesses them.
          2. Facial Symmetry
            1. It is likely that symmetry equates to fitness and good genes. These people are less likely to have been affected by harmful mutation etc. Also, people with attractive faces are preferred because of the benefits of passing on these attractive characteristics to offspring – Penton-Voak et al 2001 found females prefer males with greater face symmetry. Angelina Jolie is considered to be attractive because of her symmetrical face.
            2. Waist-to-Hip Ratio
              1. Singh 1993 found that waist-to-hip ratio a reliable predictor of attractiveness for females . It related to fat distribution which is regulated by sex hormones. He investigated body shape across cultures. Body ratio’s i.e. female waist-to-hip of 0.7 (hour glass shape) were more preferred. Males WHR preferred of 0.85 which is wide shoulders and narrow hips (a triangle shape). Further research suggests that women with a WHR higher than 0.7 often exhibit problems such as inability to conceive and general poor health. Swami and Furnham 2006 found that the optimum WHR of 0.71 corresponds closely to models such as Anna Nicole (0.69), Kate Moss (0.66) and Cindy Crawford (0.69) supporting Singh’s findings.
            3. Sexual Attraction and Evolution
              1. Short Term Mating Preferences
                1. - There appears to be differences between males and females motivation for short term relationships and casual sex. The logic of sexual selection suggests that the more females a male manages to impregnate, the greater his reproductive success.
                  1. Buss and Schmitt 1993 found men showed a marked decrease in attraction for a ‘casual’ partner after sex – don’t spend too long with one woman. However the implications are greater for the woman as mating with a poor quality male would lead to poor quality offspring. Clark and Hatfield 1989 had attractive strangers approach people at a university campus and invited them to have casual sex at their apartment. - 0% of females agreed - 75% of males agreed.
                    1. Male Strategies
                      1. Courtship Rituals - Miller sees human culture as being shaped by evolution (art, music, humour)
                        1. Size - men evolved to be bigger than females demonstrating strength for success in competition against other males
                          1. Promiscuity - males tend to be willing to mate with someone outside of their partner - This is also good for the female to have multiple fathers for her children. Greiling and Buss 2000 suggest that she could profit in a number of ways; mate switching – to leave poor quality relationship, producing more genetically diverse offspring.
                      2. Long Term Mating Preferences
                        1. Sexual selection favours high levels of selectiveness in both sexes as both sexes have to invest long term in their offspring. Poor long-term mate choice could result in wasted time and resources for both sexes. As women have an obligatory biological investment in their children, they would be expected to be very particular about their choice of mate. They would be attracted to males who; are able to invest and provide, are able to physically protect her and her children, and show promise as a good parent (Buss 2003).
                      3. Female Strategies
                        1. Sexy sons hypothesis - females choose attractive males so that they will produce equally attractive sons
                          1. Handicap hypothesis - Zahavi 1975 believes women may favour men with handicaps because they have been able to survive despite difficulty so must have strong genes
                            1. Courtship - female preference for long courtship requires males to invest time and effort making them less likely to leave after successful mating.
                          2. A02
                            1. Contradictory Evidence
                              1. Strassberg and Holtz 2003 - fictitious advertisements were used in which a hypothetical woman was described as very attractive, passionate & sensitive or financially successful and ambitious. predictions would support the first advertisement as being most popular but it was actually the second that attracted most men. challenges the assumptions of the model, questioning reliability and findings used to support explanation.
                              2. Supporting Research
                                1. the idea of youthfulness, linked to reproduction and fitness, is preferred when selecting a mate. For example, photographs of women will relatively large and wide spread eyes, a small nose and chin are regarded as more attractive. these findings are consistent with the notion in evolutionary psychology that men seek young women who are likely to be fertile. However, other findings are more contradictory. questioning the consistency of support. wide cheekbones and narrow cheeks in women are also seen as attractive and these features are not often found in young children.
                                  1. Langois et al - suggests that differential interest in attractive adult female faces emerges early in the first year of infancy, implying that the preference for attractive faces is more likely to be an evolved response than a learned behaviour. also a significant degree of cross-cultural agreement and hence support for ratings of facial attractiveness. taken together, this evidence disproves the argument that the criteria of facial attractiveness are determined by cultural conventions and supports evolutionary perspective.
                                  2. Validity
                                    1. Much of the research conducted is by questionnaire/interview. subjects may guess that certain responses are being sought and believe they are undermining scientific research by giving responses that do not support evolutionary principles. also this type of research documenting sex differences in mate choice has focused on preferences rather than life choices creating an 'as if psychology'. e.g. people may express a preference for an ideal partner but may have to settle for less. questions the validity of such studies as the methods used are not measuring realistic sexual choices, but some fantasy that maybe motivated by the media, giving a role to social learning.
                                    2. Female Preference
                                      1. Cunningham - found that men who had features such as a large square jaw, small eyes, prominent cheekbones and thin lips were regarded as attractive by women. these features as predicted by evolutionary theory, are attractive as they are not evident in young children and therefore suggest testosterone in the male, reflecting a strong immune system.
                                      2. Methodological
                                        1. we can be confident that the principles cause an individual to choose a mate based on instinctive reproductive needs, as the research is only correlational. although this allows us to identify a clear relationship between sexual selection and attributes, which may be useful for dating agencies or media, it does not allow us to identify a causal link between the two variables.
                                          1. Rubinstein and Caballero - body mass index is a predictor of sexual attraction due to signals it gives for fertility. they found that there had been a steady decrease in BMI for the winners of Miss America pageant between 1923 and 1999. changes indicate cultural changes in preferences for different body shapes, which are more likely to be dependent on learnt principles through classical and operant conditioning than evolutionary principles of sexual selecton.
                                      Show full summary Hide full summary

                                      Similar

                                      The Breakdown Model (Rollie & Duck 2006)
                                      helen.rebecca
                                      Studies from Stereotyping, Prejudice and Discrimination
                                      Toni Nursey
                                      History of Psychology
                                      mia.rigby
                                      Biological Psychology - Stress
                                      Gurdev Manchanda
                                      Bowlby's Theory of Attachment
                                      Jessica Phillips
                                      Psychology subject map
                                      Jake Pickup
                                      Psychology A1
                                      Ellie Hughes
                                      Memory Key words
                                      Sammy :P
                                      Psychology | Unit 4 | Addiction - Explanations
                                      showmestarlight
                                      The Biological Approach to Psychology
                                      Gabby Wood
                                      Chapter 5: Short-term and Working Memory
                                      krupa8711