O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Mapa mental

DAVID A JAFFE Ten Criteria for Evaluating synthesis Techniques part1

gpud EVALUATION Masters Degree Inglês

Conteúdo do mapa

DAVID A JAFFE Ten Criteria for Evaluating synthesis Techniques part1

  1. 10 EVALUATION CRITERIA: PARAMETRIC 1 - 5

    • how INTUITIVE are the parameters
      • STRONG -MAPPING control parameters to musical parameters
        • EGS STRONG
          • dynamics
          • articulation
          • ANALOG SYNTHESIS LPF maps BW / AMP less brightness with softer dynamics
            • LOW VALUES = PP
              • softer notes = lower AMP + less high freq
            • HI VALUES = FF
              • louder notes = higher AMP + more high freq
                • physical nonlinearities become more prominant as instr are played louder
            • ADJUSTABLE ON note-by-note basis: DECOUPLES
              • DISTANCE - FUNCTION OF LOUDNESS
              • DYNAMICS - FUNCTION OF BRIGHTNESS
      • WEAK UNMAPPED mathematical variables
        • EGS WEAK
          • Changing FM INDEX OF A CASCADE MODULATOR SLIGHTLY
            • DRASTIC, DIFFICULT TO PREDICT CHANGE IN TONAL QUALITY EG FROM DRUYM TO WOODBLOCK
              • Annoying for composers
              • Problematic for performer - in live situ
    • how PERCEPTIBLE are parameter changes
      • more parameters - weaker the impact of each
      • STRONG
        • sig. ch. = obvious audible effect
        • too strong = uncontrollable
        • e.g. a low pass filter proportional to cutoff freq (expon or linear)
      • WEAK
        • sig. ch. = barely audible
        • too weak = fruitless arbitrary alterations
        • METAPARAMETERS
          • EG1a
            • Used to enable more intuitive and perceptible changes to synthesis methods - e.g. brightness to each array element freq, AMP array, brightness can be applied across each element of the array
              • ActualAmps[i]=Amps[i]*MAX(brightness, 0.001)^log2(MAX(Freqs[i],100.0)/50.0)
            • addSyn used as inv FFT the LPF - log2 and MAX() rtns max of its args,
          • EG1b
            • addSyn * LineSeg - multidimentional timbral space
              • values added to scale addSyn partials producing complex interpolations (mcNabb 8f1)
          • EG2
            • Digital Sampling (*ID synth tech). edit 1 sample no effect used wtih HYBRID PARAMETERIZED PROCESSING MODULES eg filters, amp envs etc
        • EG1 addSyn - ch. amp of each partial could be weak for hi harmonics
    • how PHYSICAL are parameters
      • cntrls synthetic instr. in same way as real-world instr. is cntrled
        • EG1
          • Violin - waveguide model bow pressure/velocity (smith 92)
        • EG2
          • Clarinet mouth breath pressure parameter (cook 88)
      • ADV
        • 1 good at: Complx behaviours at unstable moments in a tones evolution eg attack and transistions
        • 2 no need for const. analytical modelling/database player/composer/implemntor neednt understand what happens in output wav during attack/trams te physical nature of parameter cuases the correct result
      • DIS
        • For nonexpert players - nonphysical INTUITIVE cntrls - more appropr.
      • for non-phys. synth parameters (eg. amp of addSyn partial -
        • SOLUTION - MAP WITH META- PARAMETER
        • PROB - need thorough ACOUSTICAL KNOWLEDGE to defne mapping adquately
    • how WELL BEHAVED are the parameters
      • EGS - LINEAR TECHNIQUES
        • when CNTRL RATE = SLOW RELATIVE TO AUDIO SR
          • STRONG
            • STRONG - PROPORTIONAL change to sound wth cntrler
            • FILTERS - GOOD DURING TRANSITIONS
              • PERRY COOK WAVEGUIDE-BASED VOCAL SYNTH MODEL 90
                • MODELS vocal tract - series waveguide filters
                  • Each waveguide filter = xsect. of vocal tract
                    • each vowel = physical interpretation - 1 or sev section diameters: shrink / incr.
                  • interpolating between vowels corres. dir. to real-world spatial interpolation
            • Each intermediate val. have INTUITIVE PHYSICAL interpretation = WELLBEHAVED
        • CNTRL parameters change RAPIDLY - ENERGY IS INECTED INTO TH SSYSTEM WTH POSS OF UNPREDICTABLE UNEXPECTED RESULTS
          • WEAK
            • WEAK - small parameter ch - WILD, UNPREDICTABLE sonic outcome
            • EG 3 NONLINEAR FB TECH (Mcintyre/ woodhouse 83
              • nonlin. FB in phys. mod. wind instr.
              • EXTREME SENS. to INITIAL COND.
                • DEF. OF CHAOTIC SYS.
                  • can be modelled in REGIONS of its STATE SPACE for PREDICABLE EFFECTIVE HAEVIOUR
          • E.G. AUDIO RATE AMPLITUDE SCALING
            • E.G. SINUSOIDAL
              • AM - 2 sidebands are produced for each componente in original signal = NONLINEAR - SIDEBANDS ARE AT FREQ CORRESONDING TO THE FREQ OF EACH COMPONENT PLUS OR MINUS THE MOD FREQ
            • E.G. NON- SINUSOIDAL
              • EVEN MORE CMPLX than above
          • EG2 FILTER STRUCTURES THAT BECOME UNSTABLE DURING TRANSITIONS FROM 1 SET OF COEFFICIENTS TO ANOTHER
    • how ROBUST is the sound's IDENTITY
      • HOW WELL SOUND RETAINS ID IN CONTEXT OF VARIATION
        • True rep. of expres.. instr. = FAMILY OF RELATED SOUNDS req.
        • not repr. of 1 note
      • Inst. Def. wth grt variety in context of particular sounrce ID
      • synthesis NOT a snapshot = expressive OVER TIME
      • EG Good
        • PHYS MOD
          • PhM Waveguide
            • Karplus- Strong String
              • rich expr. vocab. not loose ID
                • e.g. pick pos, string: flex, thickness, dyamics, decay char
              • ks 83 / jaffe J smith 83
        • SMPLING Power / flexib. CAN BE grtly enhan.
          • Multiple rec. xros
            • BW
            • dynamic contours
            • attacks
              • Vibrato
            • max multiple guises
          • filters = dynamics
          • linear interpolation for timbral variety eg thru BW n.b. take care to MATCH PITCH AND PHASE
          • as many samples per inst. as memory allows - more guises covered more expressive result
      • EG POOR
        • Pure Sampling
          • add var. to one sample = 2D cardboard sound
            • e.g. articulation, dynamics, timbre falls over if pused lightly in any direction
        • 1 pitch
      • sampling = challenge + opportunity
  2. identity synthesis technique = DIGITAL SAMPLING. Each SAMPLE is a PARAMETER itself

Informações

Descrição
David@Jaffe.com the first grouping out of two sets of five criteria each. The first relates to the parameters that define the synthesis type - whether additive synthesis, physical modelling, waveguide physical modelling, FM synthesis, AM synthesis with parameters such as filtering, envelope shaping, metaparameters, to build HYBRID METHODS - linear interpolation, from Karplus-Strong to multiple complex sampling with filtering, interpolation, delays, comb (all-pass) filters, scaling, noise filtes
Criado por
gpud
Visualizações
29
Avaliação

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?