Mapa mental
Types of Memory
Conteúdo do mapa
Types of Memory
Most psychologists agree that there are 3 types of memory
- Sensory Register: Temporary store with limited capacity and duration; constantly receiving info from senses, unless we pay attention to it info disappears through spontaneous decay. coding depends on the sense info came from
- Sperling (1960) -Method: lab experiment with 2 conditions; participants had 50 miliseconds to recall either whole grid (3 lines of 4 letters) or just one row. Results: whole grid = 4/5 letters, one row = 3 letters. Conclusion: didn't know which row was going to be selected, showed they held whole grid in sensory register but it had faded by the time they recalled 3 letters
- Lab experiment - good control of variables. Reliable
- artificial setting means low ecological validity, might not be realistic test of sensory register
- Independent groups design, no order effects
- No Control over individual differences (independent groups design)
- Sperling (1960) -Method: lab experiment with 2 conditions; participants had 50 miliseconds to recall either whole grid (3 lines of 4 letters) or just one row. Results: whole grid = 4/5 letters, one row = 3 letters. Conclusion: didn't know which row was going to be selected, showed they held whole grid in sensory register but it had faded by the time they recalled 3 letters
- Short Term memory: limited capacity and duration - coding is acoustic (sound)
- Peterson and Peterson (1959) - Method: participants were given a trigram (3 random letters e.g. CVM) and asked to recall after 3,6,9,12,15,18 seconds and told to count backwards from a given number to stop them repeating the trigram in their heads. Results: after 3 seconds 80% recalled, after 18 seconds only 10% recalled. Conclusion: when rehearsal is prevented little can stay in STM longer than 18 seconds
- Lab experiment - Good control of Variables. Reliable
- Artificial so low ecological validity, not realistic
- only one type of stimulus used, could be different for variety of stimuli
- repeated measures design - each participant did each condition, led to order effects which cause confusion or could be proactive interference
- Peterson and Peterson (1959) - Method: participants were given a trigram (3 random letters e.g. CVM) and asked to recall after 3,6,9,12,15,18 seconds and told to count backwards from a given number to stop them repeating the trigram in their heads. Results: after 3 seconds 80% recalled, after 18 seconds only 10% recalled. Conclusion: when rehearsal is prevented little can stay in STM longer than 18 seconds
- Long Term Memory: unlimited capacity and is permanent, coding is semantic.
- Episodic Memory: stores info about events and places, emotions you may have felt whilst there - memories are declarative (can be consciously recalled)
- Semantic Memory: facts and knowledge, e.g. capital cities
- Procedural Memory: "muscle memory" like how to ride a bike. non-declarative
- Bahrick et al (1975) - Method: 392 people either asked to recall names of ex-class mates (free-recall test), given photo and asked to recall names (photo-recognition test), or asked to match name to photo (Name-Recognition test). Results: 15 years after leaving school - 90% names and faces and 60% free recall, 30 years - free recall is 30%, 48 years - name recognition is 80% and photo recognition is 40%. Conclusion: Study is evidence of "very long term memories"; recognition is easier than recall, suggests memory store is there but is harder to access without cues
- Naturalistic Experiment - High ecological validity
- Variables not controlled, Unreliable
- showed better recall on LTM than other studies, may be due to being naturalistic and using meaningful information
- This type of info probably has a high rehearsal rate compared to other memories so can't be generalised to other types of memories that are unimportant
- Sensory Register: Temporary store with limited capacity and duration; constantly receiving info from senses, unless we pay attention to it info disappears through spontaneous decay. coding depends on the sense info came from
Each of the types of memory have different capacities
- Jacobs (1887) - Method: participants presented with string of digits or letters and asked to recall in correct order. sequence increased in size until participant failed. Results: average was 9 digits or 7 letters, increased with age through childhood. Conclusion: based on results jacobs concluded STM has a capacity of 5-9 items, STM capacity increases with age, probably due to memory techniques e.g. chunking
- Artificial experiment, Low ecological Validity
- Good control of Variables. Reliable
- Meaningful information may have a greater capacity
- Repeated measures design, order effects may have caused confusion, Proactive interference may have hindered recall
- Miller (1956) - meta-analysis or STM capacity research, found people can remember 7 +/-2. however chunking can be utilised to increase this capacity
- Jacobs (1887) - Method: participants presented with string of digits or letters and asked to recall in correct order. sequence increased in size until participant failed. Results: average was 9 digits or 7 letters, increased with age through childhood. Conclusion: based on results jacobs concluded STM has a capacity of 5-9 items, STM capacity increases with age, probably due to memory techniques e.g. chunking
Coding: In STM memories are kept active through repetition (acoustic coding), in LTM info is coded semantically (more useful to know meaning) although LTM can be coded visually or acoustically
- Baddeley (1966) - Method: indépendant groups design, given 4 words that were either: acoustically similar (cat, bat), acoustically disimilar (pit, cow), semantically similar (big, large) or semantically disimilar (good, hot) and asked to recall either immediately or after a 20 minute task. Results: if recalling instantly (STM) there was a problem with acoustically similar words, if recalling after a task (LTM) they had problems with semantically similar words. Conclusion: confusion of similar words suggests that STM relies on acoustic coding and LTM on Semantic.
- Artificial so low ecological validity.
- didn't consider the other types of LTM (episodic or procedural, determinist by assuming this is how LTM codes when no effort has been made to investigate other types
- Didn't consider other methods of coding (visually)
- Independent groups design - no order effects
- Independent groups design, no control over individual differences.
- good control of all variables except individual differences
- Baddeley (1966) - Method: indépendant groups design, given 4 words that were either: acoustically similar (cat, bat), acoustically disimilar (pit, cow), semantically similar (big, large) or semantically disimilar (good, hot) and asked to recall either immediately or after a 20 minute task. Results: if recalling instantly (STM) there was a problem with acoustically similar words, if recalling after a task (LTM) they had problems with semantically similar words. Conclusion: confusion of similar words suggests that STM relies on acoustic coding and LTM on Semantic.
Informações
- Descrição
- A level Psychology (Memory) Mapa Mental sobre Types of Memory, criado por Connor Hargrave em 07-04-2017.
- Criado por
- Connor Hargrave
- Visualizações
- 0
- Avaliação