Sem título

Página 1

the interviewee is asked to mentally visulaise and reinstate the context of the target event e.g. picture the scene, weather, was they were thinking and feeling at the time, the preceding events .......

the interviewee is asked to mentally visualise and reinstate the context of the target event, picture the scene, weather, what they were thinking and feeling att the time, the preceding events. this relates to context dependent forgetting, external cues in the environment helps to improve accuracy

the interviewee is asked to mentally visualise and reinstate the context of the target event, picture the seven, the father, what they were thinking and feeling at the time, the preceding events etc. this relates to context dependent forgetting, external cues in the environment help to improve accuracy.

the witness is asked to report every detail they can recall, even if it seems trivial or irrelevant to the incident. the witness is asked to report very detail that they can recall, even if it seems trivial or iorrevelant to the incident.

thw witness is asked to report every detail they can recall even of It seems trivial or irrelevant to the incident. report everything, even what they consider to be insignificant details may trigger other important memories that may be useful and accurate.

the witness is asked to report every detail they can recall even if it seems trivial or irrelevant to the incident. report everything, even what they consider to be insignificant details may trigger other important memories that may be useful and accurate.

witness is asks to re[orter the espied in several different chronological orders moving backwards and forwards in tike

witness his asked to report the episode in several different chronological orders moving backwards and forwards in time temporal./

witness is asked to report the episode in several different chronological temporal orders moving backwards and forwards in time.

this improves accuracy as it prevents the witness from reporting their expectations of how the event must have happened rather than the actual event. it also prevents dishonesty, it is hard to produce an untruth account if they have to reverse the order.

this improves accuracy as it prevents thw tines from reporting their expectations of how the event must have happened rather than the actual event. it also prevents dishonesty, it is hard to produce an untruthful account if they have to reverse the order.

witness is asked to report the episode in several different chronological temporal orders moving backwards and forwards in time. this improves accuracy as it prevents the witness from reporting their expectations of how the event must have happened rather than the actual event. it also prevents dishonest,

witness is asked to try to describe the episode as it would have been seen from different viewpoints, not just their own.

witness is asked to try to describe the episode as it would have been seen from different viewpoints, not just their own.

this disrupts the expectation of schemas on recall, the schema you would have for. particular setting.

witness is asked to try to describe the episode as it would have been seen from different viewpoints, this disrupts the expectation of schemas on recall, the schema you would have for a particular setting.

recall in reverse order= witness is asked to report the episode in several different chronological orders moving backwards and forwards In time. this improves accuracy as it prevents the witness from reporting their expectations of how the event must have happened rather than the actual event. it also prevents dishonesty! it is hard to produce a dishonest account if the order is reversed.

recall from changed perspectve= witness is asked try to describer the episode as it would have been seen from different viewpoints, not just their own. this disrupts the expectation of schemas on recall, the schema you would have for a particular setting.

context reinstatement= the interviewee is asked to mentally visualise and reinstate the context of the target event, picture the scene, the weather, what they were thinking and feeling at the time, the preceding events. this is linked to context dependent forgetting, external cues in the environment help improve accuracy.

report everything= the witness is asked to report every detail they can recall even if It seems trivial or irrelevant to the incident. report everything, even what they consider to be insignificant details may trigger other important memories that may be useful and accurate,

recall in reverse in order= witness is asked to report the episode in serval different chronological (temporal) orders moving backwards and forwards in time. this improves accuracy as it prevents the witness from reporting their expectations of how the event must have happened rather than the actual event. it also prevents dishonesty, it is hard to produce an untruthful account if they have to reverse the order.

recall from changed perspective= witness is asked to try to describe the episode as it would have been seen from different viewpoints, not just their own. this disrupts the expectation of schemas on return. the schema you would have for a particular setting.

fisher et al 1990 demonstrated the effectiveness of the cognitive interview technique in real police settings in Miami. fisher et al 1990 demonstrated the effectiveness of the cogntive interview technique in real police settings in Miami. they trained detectives to use the cognitive interview technique with genuine crime witnesses and found that the cogntive interview considerably increased the amount of information recalled compared to standard interviews.

fisher et al 1990 demonstrated the effectiveness of the cogntive interview technique in real police settings in Miami. they trained detectives to use the cogntive interview technique with genuine crime witnesses and found that the cognitive interview considerably increased the amount of information recalled compared to standard interviews. as the research was carried out on real witnesses it has high levels of realism and so it is easier to generalise the effectiveness of the cognitive interview to real life crime settings.

fisher et al 1990 demonstrated the effectiveness of the cogntive interview technique in real police settings in Miami. they trained detectives to use the cognitive interview technique with genuine crime witnesses and found that the cogntive interview considerably increased the amount of information recalled compared to standard interviews. as the research was carried out on real witnesses it has high levels of realism and so it is easier to generalise the effectiveness of the cogntive interview to real life crime settings.