Mind map
Construct Validity
Map content
Construct Validity
Criterion Validity
- evaluates how closely your measure's results align with those from existing, valid measures
- Concurrent Validity
- distinguishing participants appropriately
- e.g. if assessing a new measure of depression, participants should be separated into two groups: depressives and non-depressives
- distinguishing participants appropriately
- Predictive Validity
- measure's ability to predict future outcomes
- e.g. reading scores at 7yo's predictive power of academic performance at 17
- measure's ability to predict future outcomes
- Concurrent Validity
- evaluates how closely your measure's results align with those from existing, valid measures
Content Validity
- all aspects of the construct are being assessed
- e.g. if construct pertains to personality, does the measure assess the 5 main traits? (OCEAN)
- all aspects of the construct are being assessed
Face Validity
- the measure's content seems suitable
- e.g. does a test with math questions appear to be a relevant measure of arithmetic ability?
- the measure's content seems suitable
Discriminant (Divergent) Validity
- shows two measures that are not supposed to be related are in fact, unrelated
- correlation coefficient can be used to prove dissociation
- shows two measures that are not supposed to be related are in fact, unrelated
Convergent Validity
- two similar measures of the construct are significantly correlated (r= >.5, ideally >.7)
- e.g. studying exam anxiety (construct) via a survey and participant observation. Convergence or correlation of scores shows both are measuring the same construct
- two similar measures of the construct are significantly correlated (r= >.5, ideally >.7)
Information
- Description
- mind map of construct validity and its five subtypes
- Created by
- Julia Swain · Mar 2021
- Updated
- Mar 10, 2021
- Views
- 61
- Tags
- Rating