GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Notes

U1: Section B

Charlotte Delaforce Critical Thinking AS level English 1 page

Content of the notes (1)

Page 1

Credibility

- Always name criterion being used and say whether this strengthens or weakens the credibility

Reputation

- Must be validated with independent source

Ability to perceive

- Ability to see/hear/touch/taste/smell

Vested interest

- (Mis)represent for personal gain or to prevent loss

Expertise

- Qualifications, knowledge, training or understanding

Neutrality

- Being impartial

Plausibility

- If the outcome predicted is likely or reasonable

- Use a new idea or your own judgement with analysis of the text

Inconsistency - refers to claims that cannot both be true at the same time

Corroboration - when a claim from one source directly agrees with another source's claim

Answering credibility question

Credibility of Side A using one criterion and at least two sources and quotations

Credibility of Side B using the same criterion with at least two sources and quotations

Concluding statement about which side is more credible and why

Plausibility of Side A using a new idea/expanding from text

Plausibility of Side B "

Concluding statement about which side is more plausible and why

Overall concluding statement about credibility and plausibility

Information

Description
AS level Critical Thinking (Unit 1) Note on U1: Section B, created by Charlotte Delaforce on 21/02/2015.
Created by
Charlotte Delaforce · Feb 2015
Updated
Feb 19, 2016
Views
0
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?