Fichas
Sin título
Fichas del conjunto (11)
- 1DurationSTM: Peterson& Peterson : 24 undergrads, constant trigram& count backwards
3 secs= 80% 18 secs=3%
LTM: Bahrik, yearbook
photo rec 15 years 90%, 48 years 70%
Name recall 15 years 60%, 48 years 30% - 2CapacitySTM: Miller- Chunking 7+_2
Jacobs- digits 9.3 letters 7.3
LTM: Cowan- unlimited - 3CodingBaddeley: 4 groups of words
STM; acoustically similar
LTM; semantically similar - 4Leading questions Loftus& Palmer-Response bias, or substitution
-Loftus& Palmer- 7 films up to 30 secs, smashed/collided/bumped/hit/contacted,
Smash 40.8 mph Contact 31.8mph
-week later smashed group reported broken glass when asked - 5Loftus & Zanni-Video of a car crash
-asked about broken headlight
'A' = 7%
'the' = 17% - 6Evaluation->Foster, no serious implication so evidence more easily mislead
+>Lab study so high rep
-> Lab so artificial stimuli- unrealistic and can't generalise results
-> Anastasi& Rhodes- own age bias, younger have better recall so ind dif. - 7Post Event DiscussionGabbert et Al- 60 uni students and 60 older adults, video of a girl stealing from a wallet, tested ind. (control) or in pairs, interview then questionnaire
71% from B reported falsely 60% said guilty even though didn't witness the crime - 8Retrival failure: form of forgetting when the cues aren't present, when info is encoded Encoding specificity principle- Tulving If cue present at recall (gem) then overall recall the 48 words was 60%. If the cue was not present then recall fell to 40%.Context dependent forgetting - Godden and Baddeley- Divers 20 ft, 4 conditions, 38 unrelated words, interference listen and write 15 no. 24 hours between, 50% better same, 40% more words forgotten when changed 13.5 vs 8.5
- 9State Dependent Forgetting- Carter and CassadayGoodwin et al (1969)- hidden money/alcohol when drunk were able to find it when drunk
Carter& Cassaday- Anti-Histamines, list of words- worst recall when mismatched internal state - 10Evaluation+> Michael Eysenck- RF main reason for forgetting in LTM- real life app
+> cognitive interview app
-> Baddeley- context not that strong, rare context will be so drastically different
-> may be related to kind of memory G&B retest with recognition- no effect
-> cant test the ESP, cant know its the cue that triggered - 11—
Información
- Descripción
- A level Psychology Fichas sobre Sin título, creado por Katy Mathur el 29/05/2018.
- Creado por
- Katy Mathur
- Visitas
- 0
- Historial
-
- Creado por Katy Mathur · 29 may 2018
- Copiado por Katy Mathur · 29 may 2018
- Valoración