¡GoConqr estrena diseño! Cuéntanos qué te parece.

Fichas

Perception-Approaches

gloriachan DD303 Cognitive Psychology Hons Degree Inglés 10 fichas

Fichas del conjunto (10)

  1. 1Gestalt's approach Features* This argues that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts and focuses on perceptual organisation; which elements are grouped together.
    * Organising principles include closure, good continuation, proximity and similarity
  2. 2Gestalt's approach Eavluation- 2D stimuli cannot explain 3D objects in the real world situation
  3. 3Gibson (1979) Direct Perception Approach Features* bottom up approach
    * interested in how real objects in the visual field structured the optic array
    * invariant information (horizon ratio relation, texture gradients, motion) picked up from optic array to provide cues as to position, orientation and shape of surfaces
    * therefore ecological approach (perception cannot be studied in laboratory)
    * perception is not a product of complex cognitive analysis
    * features of objects directly afford their use (eg rock is to be stood on without further processing)
    * action is seen as the goal of perception
  4. 4Gibson (1979) Direct Perception Approach Evaluation- saw no role for memory in perception
    - prior knowledge has no role in perception
    - did not explain how info is picked up from environment
    - see action as goal and end point of perception
    + ecological: take into account real objects
  5. 5Marr (1982) Information Processing Approach Features* perception composed of a series of more and more useful information is generated at each
    * stages: grey level description --> primal sketch --> 2 1/2D sketch --> 3D object-centred description
    *
    early visual processing is a bottom up processing
    * incoming sensory information needs to be processed to produce representations for matching against stored representations
  6. 6Marr (1982) Information Processing Theory Evaluation+ takes into account the importance of cognitive processing
    + this theory has been very influential and most debates relate to the details rather than the overall approach
    - some grouping strategies make use of 3D information
  7. 7Gregory (1980) Constructivist Approach Features* purpose of perception as recognition rather than action
    * sensory information is incomplete
    * people try to recognise objects by generating hypothesis and testing these hypothesis
    * requires top down information to fill in the gaps
    * prior knowledge is essential for generating hypothesis
  8. 8Gregory (1980) Constructivist Approach Evidence* Impoverished stimuli (Street 1931)
    (- prior knowledge to guide perceptual hypothesis may lead to incorrect recognition)
    (- cannot be generalised to normal conditions)
    * Visual illusions (Muller-Lyer) generated by expectations
    (- we still see the lines are different length even though we know they are the same)
  9. 9Gregory (1980) Constructivist Approach Evaluation+ acknowledge the role of top down processing
    - evidence is questionable as poor stimulus information was used
    - cannot generalise to normal conditions
    - evidence from illusions shows perception is not influenced by conscious knowledge
  10. 10Dual-process Approach (neuropsychological evidence)* evidence from neuropsychology found two streams of visual pathways from retina to the cortex
    *Dorsal - perception for action (linked to Gibson-no link to knowledge) / damage to dorsal route: patient can describe objects but difficult to grasp them
    * Ventral - perception for recognition, conscious perception (linked to Marr and Constructivist) / damage to ventral route : e.g. DF could recognise visual objects/faces but could not pick up items
    * combining top-down and bottom-up processing
    * supporting perception can be for both action and recognition
    * Norma 2002 suggested two streams work together
    * Hupe et al (1998) suggested re-entrant pathways: bottom-up processing to produce low-level description which is used to generate perceptual hypothesis at higher level then re-entrant pathways assess the accuracy of hypothesis
    * Di Lollo et al (2000) explained visual masking effect by re-entrant processing, i.e. masking occurs due to insufficient time for re-entrant processing before the target object disappears and as the re-entrant processing from the original stimulus does not match the current mask and therefore is not perceived

Información

Descripción
Hons Degree (Perception) DD303 Cognitive Psychology Fichas sobre Perception-Approaches, creado por gloriachan el 28/09/2013.
Creado por
gloriachan
Visitas
168
Valoración

Escríbenos

¿Sobre qué es tu mensaje?

¿Qué te parece el nuevo diseño?

¿Te gusta?