Mapa mental
Memory Revision

Contenido del mapa
Memory Revision
Sensory Register
- Duration: 1/4 - 1/2 seconds
- Capacity: very large
- Encoding: sense specific
Short-term Memory
- Duration: 0 - 18 seconds
- Encoding: Mainly acoustic
- Capacity: 7±2 items
Long-term Memory
- Capacity: Unlimited
- Duration: Unlimited
- Encoding: Mainly Semantic (can be acoustic/visual)
Multi-store Model A03
- Strength: gives us good understanding of the structure and process of STM, this is good because it allows researchers to expand on this model.
- means researchers can conduct experiments to improve the model
- makes the model more valid
- means researchers can conduct experiments to improve the model
- MSM oversimplifies STM & LTM: much more complicated
- e.g// The Working Memory Model (Baddely & Hitch) showed that STM is not a simply unitary store and comprises of different components
- e.g.// Central Executive, visual-spatial sketchpad etc.
- e.g// The Working Memory Model (Baddely & Hitch) showed that STM is not a simply unitary store and comprises of different components
- Model suggest that rehearsal helps info to transfer to LTM, which is not essential. it raises questions like; how are we able to recall info which we did not rehearse (e.g/ swimming) but unable to recall info which we did rehearse (e.g// revision notes)
- Therefore, importance of rehearsal is not as significant as Atkinson & Shiffrin
- Strength: gives us good understanding of the structure and process of STM, this is good because it allows researchers to expand on this model.
Research study for STM & LTM (AO1 & A03)
- Glanzer & Cuntiz show that when participants were presented with a list of words. They tend to remember the first few and last few.
- Serial Dispostion Effect
- Supports existence of separate LTM & STM stores because they observed a primacy and recency effect
- Serial Dispostion Effect
- Case of KF also supports distinction between STM & LTN
- KF had been in a motorcycle accident where he sustained brain damage
- His LTM seemed to be unaffected but only able to recall last buts of info in his STM
- Glanzer & Cuntiz show that when participants were presented with a list of words. They tend to remember the first few and last few.
Long-term Memory
- Earliest distinction between LTM was proposed by Tulving (1972)
- Procedural Memory
- responsible for knowing things
- Does not require conscious thought; its automatic
- Not declarative
- Semantic Memory
- Responsible for storing info about the world
- Involves conscious thought
- Is declarative
- Episodic Memory
- Responsible for storing info about event (i.e events)
- Involves conscious thought
- Is declarative
- Procedural Memory
- Earliest distinction between LTM was proposed by Tulving (1972)
Working Memory Model
- Baddeley and Hitch, 1974. Replaces the idea that STM is a unitary store
- Suggests a system involving active processing and short-term storage of information.
- Central Executive
- Determines which info is attended to. Can process info in all sensory form. Directs the info to the correct slave systems
- Limited capacity; 1 piece of info at one time
- Phonological Loop
- Temporary store for holding auditory info in speech based form
- Phonological Store
- Inner Ear; stores words you hear
- Articulatory Loop
- Inner Voice; allows for maintenance rehearsal
- Key role in development of reading
- Visuo-spatial sketchpad
- Temporary store for holding visual and spatial info
- Visual Cache
- Stores visual data about form and colour
- Inner Scribe
- Records info about the arrangement of objects
- Rehearses and transfer from the Visual Cache to the Central Executive
- Episodic Buffer
- Backup store for info
- Baddeley and Hitch, 1974. Replaces the idea that STM is a unitary store
Working Memory Model A03
- Supported by Dual-task studies, it is easier to do tasks which use two different slave systems than doing tasks which require the same slave system.
- Because the 2 tasks would be competing for the limited capacity of the slave system
- KF supports the WMM. After his accident his STM was damaged. KF's impairment was mainly for verbal info, but visual info was largely unaffected
- This shows differentiation for separate STM stores
- However its is unreliable as brain-damaged patients are unique cases.
- This shows differentiation for separate STM stores
- Limitation: little is known about the Central Executive. It is an important part of the WMM but its exact role is unclear
- Limitation: Model does not explain the link between Working memory and LTM
- Supported by Dual-task studies, it is easier to do tasks which use two different slave systems than doing tasks which require the same slave system.
Research study for WMM
- Baddeley & Hitch conducted an experiment. Participants were asked to perform 2 tasks at the same time (Dual-task technique)
- A digit span task which required them to repeat a list of numbers and a verbal reasoning task which required them to answer to answer true or false to various questions
- Results: As the number of digits increased participants took longer to answer, not much longer: a fraction of a second. And they didn't make any errors in the verbal reasoning task as the number of digits increased
- Conclusion: The verbal reasoning task made use of the central executive and the digit span task made use of the phonological loop
- Results: As the number of digits increased participants took longer to answer, not much longer: a fraction of a second. And they didn't make any errors in the verbal reasoning task as the number of digits increased
- A digit span task which required them to repeat a list of numbers and a verbal reasoning task which required them to answer to answer true or false to various questions
- Baddeley & Hitch conducted an experiment. Participants were asked to perform 2 tasks at the same time (Dual-task technique)
Explanations for Forgetting
- Interference
- A01
- Proactive interference
- Old learning prevents recall of more recent information.
- Retroactive interference:
- New learning prevents recall of previously learned info. New memories disrupts old memories
- Proactive interference
- A01
- Retrieval Failure
- is where info is available in LTM but cannot be recalled because of the absence of appropriate cues
- Retrieval cues
- Context Dependant
- External cues in the environment e.g. smell, place etc. Evidence indicates that retrieval is more likely when the context at encoding matches the context at retrieval
- State Dependant
- Bodily cues inside us e.g. emotions etc. Retrieval will be best when a persons physical or psychological state is simliar at encoding and retrieval
- Organisation
- Recall is improved if the organisation gives a structure which provides triggers e.g categories
- Context Dependant
- Interference
Imágenes y archivos del mapa
Información
- Descripción
- AS level Psychology Mapa Mental sobre Memory Revision, creado por Shabs Malik el 12/04/2017.
- Creado por
- Shabs Malik
- Visitas
- 6
- Historial
-
- Creado por Shabs Malik · 10 abr 2017
- Copiado por Shabs Malik · 12 abr 2017
- Valoración
