Klein vs. Bowlby

MeganBrianna
Mind Map by MeganBrianna, updated more than 1 year ago
MeganBrianna
Created by MeganBrianna almost 7 years ago
65
1

Description

Individual Differences Mind Map on Klein vs. Bowlby, created by MeganBrianna on 05/01/2013.
Tags

Resource summary

Klein vs. Bowlby
1 1927
2 Theory
2.1 Object Relations Theory
2.2 Influence of Thanatos on anxiety
2.3 Measured by Quality of Object Relations Scale (QORS)
2.4 Phantasy (unconscious) vs. Fantasy (conscious)
2.5 Innovative child analysis, positive move away from Oedipus/Elektra complex
3 1969
4 Theory
4.1 First attachment theorist
4.2 Types:
4.2.1 Secure
4.2.2 Insecure
4.2.2.1 Ainsworth Research
4.2.2.1.1 Avoidant
4.2.2.1.2 Anxious-Ambivalent
4.2.2.1.3 Good experimental support but effected by culture
4.3 Focus on attachment, no other biological systems
4.4 Distinguishes between sexual and emotional intimacy
5 Compare
5.1 Supporting measurements
5.2 Revival of psychodynamic approach
5.3 Positive view, not malattachment
6 Contrast
6.1 Klein - Whole mother-child relationship, Bowlby - Only focuses on attachment
6.2 Klein - Self-supporting scale, Bowlby - Needs Ainsworth research
6.3 Klein - Too Freudian, Bowlby - Ignores concepts
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

Strengths and Weaknesses of Psychological Approaches
Robyn Chamberlain
Individual Differences - Rosenhan (1973)
Robyn Chamberlain
Individual Differences -Thigpen and Cleckley (1953)
Robyn Chamberlain
Discuss definitions of abnormality (12)
vmanim1
Horney's Defense Mechanisms
katherine93
Intelligence
lb1404315130
Rosenhan
mad-megz165
Core studies
Cerys Gill
Gestalt
Mollie Payne
Definitions of Abnormality
Joy W
Freud vs. Erikson
MeganBrianna