Notes
Milgram: Electric Shock Study
Content of the notes (1)
Page 1
Milgram's Electric Shock Study.
Procedure:
40 men
Leaner (Confederate)
Teacher (Participant)
Experimenter (Confederate)
450 volts max
Teacher gives leaner 'shock' for every incorrect answer
If teacher refuses they are prompted by the experimenter to continue; 'please continue', 'it's crucial that you continue', ' you must continue', 'you have no choice but to continue'.
Findings:
65% of participants (teachers) gave the max of 450 volts shock.
A high amount of participants when up to around 300 volts.
Conclusion:
Behavior is Situational rather than dispositional.
Not always evil people who commit crimes, 'normal people' have the ability to commit crimes too.
Other Situational Versions of Milgrams experiment:
Office - 48% max shock
Ordinary person as Experimenter - 18% max shock
Experimenter in another room - 20% max shock
Leaner and Teacher in the same room - 40% max shock
Teacher forces Learners hand onto shock plate - 30% max shock
2 other Teachers (confederates) rebel - 10% max shock
Other Teacher (confederate) gives the shock instead - 93% max shock
What these variations show about obedience:
Proximity - The closer the participant (teacher) was to the experimenter, the more likely they are to give the max shock of 450 volts.
The closer the participant (teacher was to the learner, the least likely they are to give the max shock.
e.g. In Separate Rooms from Experimenter - 20%
Location - If the location is more formal, the more likely participants are to give the max shock voltage, vice versa for an informal setting.
e.g. Office Block - 48%
Uniform - A person who looks as if they have less authority the less likely participants were to give the max shock voltage.
e.g. Ordinary Person - 18%
Information
- Description
- AS - Level Psychology (Social Psychology: Conformity, Obedience, Social Influecence) Note on Milgram: Electric Shock Study, created by Megan Bray4033 on 13/04/2016.
- Created by
- Megan Bray4033
- Views
- 0
- Rating
More on Obedience studies and situational variables