O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Mapa mental

Topic 4: Learning psychology

Maria Angela Samonte Psychology A-Level Inglês

Mind map about learning psychology: operant conditioning, Pavlov's experiment and social learning theory

Mind map: Learning psychology

Conteúdo do mapa

Topic 4: Learning psychology

  1. ·

    • Shaping
      • waiting, actual bh before, rt
      • waiting, action, nearer to the desired bh
      • rewarding moves towards the desired bh
      • = using operant, in the form of rewards + punishments, a complex bh that wouldn't occur as a whole naturally so couldn't be reinforced itself. reinforcing small parts of the bh + gradually asking for more, before, reward
      • E.g. ad, squirrel, conquer an assault course. The whole course couldn't, achieved in 1 attempt. reward each part, course
  2. Vaughan et al. (2014), calves: didn't continue to use 1 calf bc of its distress

  3. Evaluation of operant + classical conditioning theories as explanations of human bh

    • Objective measures + careful controls. scientifically. some bh, isolated. E.g. Skinner, cage, varied, IV, differences introduced, clear, measured, DV carefully
    • Therapy, useful
    • E.g. cats, learn, out, puzzle box by trial + error. vs. problem-solving techniques + previous experience. not useful
    • lack validity. isolate bh, reducing such bh to a small part of normal activities. concepts aren't valid, apply just to small parts of overall bh
  4. Social learning theory

    • alongside operant, observational learning = watch what others do + copy, thus learning new bhs
    • learning goes 2 ways. individual affecting the environ too, e.g. cognitive processes involved in whether someone learns or not
    • interacting = reciprocal determinism
      • not only does the environ. act on the individual to 'cause' learning, but also the individual acts on their environ. e.g. attending to a modelled bh, retaining it, reproducing it, motivated to reproduce it
    • steps in observational learning
      • 1. bh, modelled by a role model. someone important to the individual
      • 2. observer identifies w/ the role model. connection. link.
      • 3. bh, observed + noted
      • 4. bh, imitated. whether, repeated again, pattern, consequences
    • Modelling
      • a live model: someone is actually doing the bh
      • verbal instruction: talked through the bh
      • through symbols, e.g. TV, or actual symbols, e.g. rep. happiness through certain bhs or objects
    • imitation depends on
      • model
      • consequences, seen
      • Rt = motivational
      • identified w/ + involved, + showing the bh
      • element of thinking in learning's processes, not considered in classical or operant
    • cognitive processes in observational learning
      • observed, attended to, stored in M, rewarded, motivation to reproduce it
      • Bh, may not be exhibited until some time after the learning has occurred
    • 4 stages, relate to cognitive processes
    • Vicarious learning
      • Vicarious extinction, stop, seen, not rewarded
      • Vicarious rt: ___________________ effect
        • Modelling: seen + wouldn't have done otherwise
        • Eliciting: does it a bit differently
        • Disinhibiting: bh, done that someone wouldn't think OK but has seen it done w/o negative consequences + now thinks, OK
        • Inhibitory: role model punished, don't do it
    • Models, more likely
      • similar, in the mind of the observer
      • perceived, important or prestigious
      • bh, observable
    • E
      • experimental evidence. Bandura. E.g. Mineka, observer monkeys, learn a fear of, snake + snake-like objects bc model monkeys show fear of snakes
      • therapy. E.g. OCD, operant conditioning principles + shaping. 1 piece, rewarded for not carrying out that bh. Someone the patient trusts, desired bh, see, consequences aren't unpleasant. keep touching an object w/o hand-washing
      • Bh might not be exhibited immediately, difficult, test for observational learning. Experiments, specific bhs, specific time, results, limited, lack of validity
  5. Stimulus-substitution theory

    • = the UCR = same as the CR but appears in response to a different stimulus.
      • E.g. aunt, substituted for the flowers, sneeze
    • CR can be weaker, UCR
      • E.g. biological R to an electric shock = increased heart rate. Something, paired w/ the shock, R, CS, lowered heart rate. not what classical, predicts. CNS, can yield different Rs, expected
  6. stimulus generalisation

    • = S similar, CS, CR
    • opp. discrimination (conditioning, focused in on a specific S)
      • using other bell tones w/o food. just food w/ the required bell tone
  7. Pavlov's 1927 experiment

    • A = cerebral cortex works, survival
      • look at reflexes, pathways, brain
    • some higher-order thinking + manageable, tested
    • In Lecture II, artificiality of experiments, isolation from RL S. However, w/o this isolation of vs, study of the complexity of the cerebral cortex isn't possible. sacrifice validity for reliability, objectivity, + scientific credibility
    • P
      • special chamber
        • can't hear footsteps outside, room
        • experimenter's blinking, movements, sweating, not S
      • Lecture II, metronome, food
      • pairing, 20 times, but, variation, strength, CS
      • meat, mouth, check the salivation reflex
      • electric buzzer, 5-10 s after meat didn't
        • appearing w/ meat once, before, did give salivation
    • R
      • metronome, started after 9s. By 45s, 11 drops, collected (Lecture II)
      • tested the reflex itself
      • after, didn't. before + paired once did.
      • alert + no other S present, distract or affect the acquired learning, conditioning
      • secondary conditioning = first CS (metronome), + NS (buzzer). Buzzer, CS, CR
    • C
      • signalisation
        • links, metronome to food, R
        • needed, survive (e.g. learned association between, metronome + meat) + natural inborn reflexive responses (e.g. salivation, meat)
      • same experiment, 2 dogs, opp. effects
        • Conditioning, sensitive to many extraneous vs, + individual differences
      • As, no possibility of looking @ the cerebral cortex's functioning, there's a complexity, 'paths' that develop through conditioning that is hard to study
    • E
      • A = objective + scientifically credible results
      • Pavlov + his team repeated many experiments, continually found, CS, CR, buzzer, metronome, + other S
      • chamber + no other S present
        • RL bh isn't being looked at, data aren't valid
          • However, w/o this isolation of vs, study of the complexity of the cerebral cortex isn't possible. E.g. salivation is valid - it is salivation.
      • unable to measure brain activity directly, assume what was happening in the cerebral cortex, experiments
        • felt, shown inbuilt pathways, UCS, UCR
          • showed new associations, which could be new pathways, CS, CRs
        • couldn't study the exact mechanisms as we can today, e.g. fMRI scanning
      • evolution led Pavlov, generalise, dogs, same processes. do have reflexes as dogs do
        • different higher-order processing. But, classical, treatment of alcoholism, processes of classical, do apply
  8. operant conditioning

    • voluntary bh
    • consequences, after R, whereas, classical, S, R
    • punishment doesn't help to achieve the desired bh; only stops undesired bh. only attention, rewarding, not, therapy, wanting, change bh
  9. Contingency = bh + consequences, dependent on one another - clear link

  10. Contiguity = timing between, bh + consequences, not too long, relate to one another

  11. Continuous rt = when each bh gets the consequence, e.g. every peck when green light, reward, food pellet. not a schedule, always happens, every time, every peck

  12. 4 schedule of rt

    • fixed interval = regarding the time of the reward (or punishment) there's a fixed time. More bhs as the time for the reward increases
    • variable interval = regarding the time of the reward (or punishment), there's a variable time. bhs are steady, unknown when, consequences.
    • fixed ratio = regarding the no. of bhs, reward or punishment is at a set no.. High no. of responses up to the consequences being given, but, might, period, not many responses once, reward, given.
    • variable ratio = reward or punishment, given rather randomly w/ regard, no. of bhs. most efficient, unknown when, consequences, arrive. bh can, continuous

Informações

Descrição
Topic 4, Learning. Pavlov. Social learning theory
Visualizações
62
Avaliação

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?