GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Flashcards

Agression and intergroup conflict

murat sertay Social social English 33 cards

Cards in this deck (33)

  1. 1What did Dollard suggest about the environment?The existence of frustration always leads to some form for aggression and vice versa.
  2. 2What did Anderson tribute to the increase in aggression?The increase in temrapture. Curvilinear.
  3. 3What did Berkowitz find when pp immersed their hand in cold waterMore aggression.
  4. 4What did bandora find and do?Bobo doll of watching adults aggression made higher levels of actions by children.
  5. 5Black and ven (1992) what did they find?film goers who watched a film had higher post aggression.
  6. 6Bushman and anderson (2002), desensitising in video games?Videos games showed significant increases in expectations of conflict that would be handled aggressively.
  7. 7What is excitation transfer (1974),Aroused through intensive bicycle riding then annoyed by rude or critical comment and then opportunity to administer unpleasant nice to person who provoked them.
    Incorporates;
    ! External stimuli
    ! Physiological reaction ! Cognitive processing
  8. 8What comprises the general aggression model?Personality
    Biological
    Person
    Situation
    Appraisal
    Inner state
    Action
    Environmental
  9. 9Other than initial person and environment factors what other things can influence aggression?Potential egressive situation can also be influenced by the actions the participants undertake in the confrontation.
  10. 10What are the strengths and weaknesses of the aggression model?Encompasses many different facets
    ! Allows for the cyclical nature
    ! Aggression understood as a process that generates / regenerates context
    Quite Individualistic
    The measures of aggression are very varied and may not relate closely to ‘real world’ instances of aggressive behaviour
  11. 11Critiquing Individual Situational Approaches ! Brown (2000)? GAMexplanations in terms of individual’s inner states does not readily explain co-ordinated aggression as found in inter-group conflict
    Also reduces conflict to irrational individual actions – which does not take account of the often targeted and purposeful nature of aggression
  12. 12What does reicher say about social identity theory?Control – redirecting traffic
    ! Shared Limits – not beyond St Paul’s area
    ! Community
    ! Identity
  13. 13What is social identity theorycontext social action to action
  14. 14How does social identity theory empties intergroup conflictin terms of people acting in terms of their group identity.
  15. 15What does Drury & Reicher (2000) elaborated social indeitty model suggest?Crowd action does not only reflect identities it
    can also create new identities
    ! Participants are changed through their participation in crowd events.
    Concepts of self and other underwent a sequence of changes that were contingent on the intergroup interaction
    People’s identities as group members can be shaped by their participation in crowd events.
  16. 16Describe the elaborated social identity modelcontext identity action identity
  17. 17What are criticisms of the ESIM?How long lived is the change?
    ! Should the interviews be taken at face value? ! Ideologically informed analysis?
  18. 18What are issues of the social indeitty approaches.What about crowds where identity is not an issue?
    There are material issues rather than just identity?
  19. 19Livingstone and Haslam (2008), what di antoganosistic social identity content?both reflect and predict relations between groups.
    ! Not just about processes such as positive differentiation – also actual content of group identities-
  20. 20IS it just process or content? and who says they shouldn't bee traded as independent?Attention tends to be on understanding causes in a relatively content free way.A number of researchers now emphasise specific content of negative views about the outgroup.
    Haslam (2007) content of dehumanising of outgroup.
  21. 21What does sheriff suggest about realistic conflict?When goals are mutually incompatible they create aggression?
    Intergroup conflict is a material conflict of interest.
  22. 22Sheriff robers cave and how might conflict be reducedStage 1 in-group formation.
    stage 2 competitions of mutalutally incompatible goals
    Relativity easy to bring harmony between two group
  23. 23What does unification of groups against a "common enemy" necessarily implywidening the area of conflict.
  24. 24Who was tension tried to be reduced?Through making individual rivalries
  25. 25why are interaction situations are "life-like"embody valued goals and appear to subjects as spontaneous and natural,
  26. 26Why is the verification of observational data are "laboratory-like"verification of observational data are "laboratory-like" because they are introduced with little of the artificiality of the laboratory, but with no loss in precision.
  27. 27How does the data confirm the hypotheses concerning conditions conduciveformation of unfavorable attitudes toward functionally related out-groups and conditions conducive to their change to attitudes of cooperation and friendship between groups.
  28. 28How has aggression bee defined in the past? and how is it defined now?Electric shocks
    ◦ Negative questionnaire evaluations
    ◦ Reported willingness to use violence ◦ Observations of physical conflict
    Conceptual definitions:
    ◦ Lubeck (1995) “two men fighting”
    ◦ Pro-social anti-social and point of view
  29. 29What is a critise of how aggression has been defined?insufficient attention to how aggression implicitly/ explicitly defined in much of the empirical research and the assumptions that may be at work in such definitions.
  30. 30How has social psychology seen the definition of aggression?aggression in a way that has relied on overly individualistic conceptualisations.
  31. 31How has aggression been defined in an ideological sense?strong institutionally sanctioned dimension – genocide violence
  32. 32What roles there for ideology?! Ideologies which justify and legitimate aggression.
  33. 33What did courtenay (2000) find in terms of aggression?Courtenay (2000)
    ! Constructions of masculinity amongst men involved in repeated violence:

Information

Description
social Social Flashcards on Agression and intergroup conflict, created by murat sertay on 12/08/2016.
Created by
murat sertay
Views
0
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?