Mind map
Euthanasia
Map content
Euthanasia
From the Greek meaning 'good/easy death' - the deliberate ending of someone's life when they are in a condition when they cannot do so themselves
- Can be passive (food/medicine denied/withheld) or active (lethal injection, drug etc)
- Can be voluntary (the patient's choice) or involuntary (eg if the patient is in a coma and cannot make the choice themselves)
Issues
- Sanctity of life vs quality of life
- Is the act of killing always wrong?
- Do the motives make a difference?
- Is there a difference between killing and letting die?
- What makes a person?
The sanctity of life
- Idea that life comes from God, is sacred, is God's to take away
- Differing views on what makes a person
- Eg, maybe not still a person if in a persistent vegetative state
- But this could be extended to the severely ill/mentally handicapped - not an appealing idea
- Germain Grisez: When someone is alive, they're a person
- Eg, maybe not still a person if in a persistent vegetative state
- Catholics: 'Suffering has a special place in God's creation.' Hebrews 13:5 'Never will I leave you.'
- Intention is important - painkillers that kill as a side effect are OK, but actively killing is not.
- Human dignity should be preserved - do not go to 'extraordinary measures' to keep someone alive.'
- This is vague and hard to measure
- Proportionalism: no unnecessary treatment past what would be given to an ordinary ill person
- Daniel Maguire: Human life is a basic but not absolute good: respect it but do not prolong it
- We are not God's property
- Peter Singer: listen to a person's preference
- We are not God's property
- More acceptable if the dying process has already started
- Differing views on what makes a person
- Idea that life comes from God, is sacred, is God's to take away
The right to life
- If we have this, we have a responsibility not to kill others
- But we don't always take 'do not kill' as an absolute - eg in war
- Capital punishment in some countries
- Is there ever a duty to kill?
- The Hippocratic Oath - non maleficence
- But we don't always take 'do not kill' as an absolute - eg in war
- If we have this, we have a responsibility not to kill others
Suicide
- Thomas Aquinas said this was a rejection of God's gift of an eternal soul
- Why is suicide condemned, but martyrdom and dying in war accepted?
- Issue of a 'nanny state' trying to persuade people away from drugs, smoking, overeating etc. Does this go against autonomy?
- Is there much difference between suicide and euthanasia?
- Thomas Aquinas said this was a rejection of God's gift of an eternal soul
Personal autonomy
- JS Mill: in matters not concerning others, we should have free choice
- Any competent adult has the right to decide and manner of their death
- In some countries such as the Netherlands, if quality of life is poor, the patient capable of choice, and death imminent, euthanasia is accepted
- Should palliative care be more important?
- JS Mill: in matters not concerning others, we should have free choice
Killing/letting die
- Many in a PVS are withdrawn from treatment
- Painkillers are given in death-hastening doses
- We do not have a right to have our lives saved
- James Rachels: A passive euthanasia is worse because it's drawn out. Since the result is the same, active euthanasia should be accepted.
- The 'slippery slope' argument
- James Rachels: A passive euthanasia is worse because it's drawn out. Since the result is the same, active euthanasia should be accepted.
- We do not have a right to have our lives saved
- Painkillers are given in death-hastening doses
- Many in a PVS are withdrawn from treatment
For and against
- For
- Values people's choice and dignity
- Prevents suffering
- It can be regulated
- Spares healthcare resources
- We allow death in war
- Against
- Sanctity of life
- The elderly/ill could be pressured
- Values sick people's lives less
- Prevents search for treatments
- For
Applying ethical theories
- Utilitarianism
- Would allow it to end suffering (pleasure over pain)
- Examines effect on society - NHS resources vs 'slippery slope'
- Singer: people in a PVS have no preference
- Mill: preserve dignity
- Natural Law
- Preserving life is a primary precept
- Treatment can be refused - proportion is important
- Preserving life is a primary precept
- Kant
- Can it be universalised?
- If what a person chooses is a law of nature it's OK - eg dying from 'losing the will to live.'
- Is killing someone to end pain using them as means to an end?
- Kant himself was opposed to it
- Can it be universalised?
- Utilitarianism
Information
- Description
- A-Level Ethics Mind Map on Euthanasia, created by Sumahlor on 06/05/2015.
- Created by
- Sumahlor
- Views
- 10
- Tags
- Rating