GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Flashcards

MSM and WMM

f.n97 Psychology As Level English 36 cards

MSM and WMM

Cards in this deck (36)

  1. 1WMMBaddeley and Hitch
    -questioned the existence of a single store for STM and saw the STM as more of an 'active' store (active, not just a store) which holds several pieces of info whilst being worked on
    -saw that STM is more complex than just a temporary store for transferring info into LTM
  2. 2WMM is comprised of:-phonological loop
    -visuo-spatial sketchpad
    -central executive
    WMM is comprised of:
  3. 3Evidence to support WMMThe KF Case Study supports the Working Memory Model. KF suffered brain damage from a motorcycle accident that damaged his short-term memory. KF's impairment was mainly for verbal information - his memory for visual information was largely unaffected. This shows that there are separate STM components for visual information (VSS) and verbal information (phonological loop).
  4. 4Evidence for the WMMBaddeley and Hitch- Dual task technique
    -task 1: 2 statements given to p's, p's required to state whether the order is true or false as quickly as possible
    -task 2- p's given one of three tasks:
    1: p's required to repeat 'the' over and over again' (occupying articulatory loop)
    2: p's has to say random digits out loud (occupying CE and articulatory loop)
    3: p's not required to complete a second task
  5. 5Findings + conclusion:-When task 1 was combined with version 1 (repetitively saying 'the') or version 3 (not doing second task) of task 2 performance was not affected (p's just as fast at making T or F decisions)
    -When task 1 was combined with version 2 of task 2 (random digits out loud) performance suffered as speed dropped significantly.
    -conclusion: -doing two tasks that require the same component of memory causes difficulty
    -supporting the idea of a separate store for different types of info
  6. 6The central executive-limited capacity
    -attends to one input whilst inhibiting others
    -co-ordinates performances between two separate tasks/ switches input between the two 'slave' systems
    -involved in higher mental processes such as decision making and problem solving
    -decides which information is attended to and which parts of the working memory to send that information to be dealt with
  7. 7Location of central executive and study to support this-located in pre frontal cortex
    -D'Esposito et al used fMRI scans on the brain
    -pre-frontal cortex was activated when verbal and spatial tasks were performed simultaneously- due to CE being activated, switching its input between the two different 'slave' systems
    -not activated when verbal and spatial tasks were performed separately
    -suggests that the CE is associated with this part of the brain (pre frontal cortex)
  8. 8Criticise the CE-vague
    -capacity unknown
    -don't know how it works/ what it does
  9. 9Phonological loop-primarily an acoustic store therefore acoustic confusion with similar sounding words
    -'slave' system
    -deals with order of information
    -limited capacity (determined by the amount of info spoken out loud in about 2 secs)
    -divided into two sub- parts; the phonological store and articulatory loop
  10. 10Evidence for the phonological loopBaddeley et al: word length effect
    -laboratory experiment
    -p's given a list of words for a brief period of time
    -one list has monosyllabic, familiar words
    -The other list had polysyllabic words
    -one list at a time they were asked to recall the lists and write them down in serial order
    -the average correct recall over several trials showed superiority for shorter words
  11. 11Conclusion:-capacity of the phonological loops is determined by the length of time taken to say the words rather than the number of itmes in the list
    -capacity estimated to be around 1.5 seconds
    -also supports the idea of the phonological loop holding auditory information
  12. 12Phonological store-passive
    -inner ear
    -stores words heard in acoustic code
  13. 13Articulatory loop-inner-voice
    -allows sub-vocal repetition of words whilst we are preparing to speak
  14. 14Visuo-spatial sketchpad-deals with non phonological information
    --uses visual code (visually organises info) -'inner eye'
    -helps rehearse visual and spatial information
    -'slave' system
    -temporary store of visual and spatial items and the relationship between them -essentially a store for what items are and where they are located
    -helps individuals navigate and interact with their environment
    -information rehearsed and encoded through use of mental pictures
    -stores visual material about form and colour
    -two sub-parts visual cache- passive- stores visual material about colour and form and the inner scribe- active part- 'rough mental paper'
  15. 15Evidence for the visuo-spatial sketchpadKlauer and Zhao:
    -suggested that there was more interference between two visual tasks than between a visual and spatial task
    -implying the existence of a separate visual cache and inner scribe
  16. 16MSM: Atkinson and ShiffrinMSM: Atkinson and Shiffrin
  17. 17Where does the information entering the sensory memory come from?the senses e.g. smell, touch, taste, sound and sight
  18. 18What is the process by which memories are transferred from the sensory store to STM?paying attention to the particular thing
  19. 19What is the process called for memories that get lost? From which stores do we lose memories?Loss: all stores lose memories
  20. 20What is the duration of each of the stores?Sensory: 1-2 secs
    STM: 18 secs (20-30)
    LTM: Up to a lifetime
  21. 21How is info in the STM and LTM encoded?STM: acoustically
    LTM: semantincally
  22. 22What is the capacity of the STM and LTM?STM: 7+/-2 units
    LTM: unlimited
  23. 23Some researchers believe that memories in the LTM do not get lost. According to this suggestion, how do we forget long term memories?Due to problems with retrieval
  24. 24Evidence for MSMBrain damages patients: some patients suffer damage to long term memory but not short term memory (e.g. Clive Wearing) whilst other patients suffer damage to short term memory not long term memory: this suggests short term memory and long term memory are stored in different place (different stores).
  25. 25Evidence to support the MSMEvidence to support the MSM
  26. 26Study for encoding for STMBaddeley
    -examined whether encoding in STM is primarily acoustic or semantic
    -75 p's presented one of four lists:
    1: acoustically similar words (list A)
    2. acoustically dissimilar words (list B)
    3. semantically similar words (list C)
    4: semantically dissimilar words (list D)
    -given a list containing original words in the wrong order, they were asked to rearrange in the correct order
    -List A recalled least efficiently
    -seems to be acoustic confusion in STM, suggesting STM is encoded on an acoustic basis (words get muddled up as they sound very similar)
  27. 27Study for encoding for LTMBaddeley:
    -75 p's presented with one of four lists:
    1: acoustically similar words (list A)
    2: acoustically dissimilar words (list B)
    3. semantically similar words (list C)
    4. semantically dissimilar words (list D)
    -p's asked to recall words in each list after a 20 min interval
    -semantically similar words recalled less efficiently at a 55% recall compared to 70-85% recall of the other lists.
    -semantic confusion in LTM, suggesting LTM encoded semantically
  28. 28Why do Baddeley's results for encoding support the MSM?-after the sensory memory store, to convert info to STM you must pay attention to the words (they are stored acoustically)
    -in order to remember the info and transfer into LTM there must be maintenance rehearsal (semantic memory)
  29. 29Evaluation of Baddeley's studies into encoding-findings make 'cognitive sense' e.g. if you had to remember a shopping list you'd probably repeat it out loud (elaborative rehearsal)
    -laboratory study- (causality (cause and effect relationships) - cannot prove cause and effect but very controlled conditions- no extraneous variable as variables controlled
    -can be replicated because it's a laboratory study
    -lacks ecological validity (not representative of real life activities)
    -could be other factors that could manipulate results such as a participant with a memory problem
  30. 30Study for the capacity of STMJacobs
    -p's asked to write down numbers/ letters from memory immediately after hearing them
    -increased the number of numbers/letters by one with each presentation
    -on average capacity for numbers was 9 items and for letters it was seven items
    - concluded that the capacity for STM 7+/-2 units
  31. 31suggestion for the capacity of LTM?Anokhin:
    -estimated the number of possible neuronal connections (1 followed by 10.5 kilometres of noughts)
    -concluded that all the potential could not be used
    -no human yet exists who can use all the potential of their brain
    -suggesting capacity unlimited
  32. 32Study for the duration of STM:Peterson and Peterson:
    -24 p's (students)
    -triad called out + immediately afterwards p's would count down from 100 in 3's to prevent maintenance rehearsal
    -time of which p's counted down from 100 increased each time
    -after a specific time, p's were asked to recall the triad
  33. 33Findings and conclusion of STM study for duration:p's more able to recall triads after a shorter period of time
    -after a longer period of time p's are less able to recall triads
    - 90% p's could recall triads in the first 3 secs
    -below 5% p's could recall triads after 18 secs
    -conclusion: without rehearsal, length of STM is approximately 18 secs
    -if rehearsal prevented, very little info remains in STM for very long
  34. 34Study for duration of the LTM:Bahrick et al:
    -400 p's aged 17-74 from USA
    -asked to recall members from their class by free recall then asked to recall members from their class by verbal recognition and visual recognition
    -findings: those who left 15 years previously 60% accurate with free recall, after 48 years 30% accurate
    -after 15 years, recalled 90% faces + names
    -After 48 years- recalled 80% of names and 70% of faces
    -memory seems to worsen over years (loss/ displacement or problems with retrieval) but memory for faces is long lasting
  35. 35Evaluation for study for duration of LTM:-role of rehearsal: p's could still have some contact with their old classmates, therefore memories may not be as old as study suggests
    -better ecological validity- recall of old friends is a common activity
  36. 36Evaluation of the MSM-number of studies have poor ecological validity
    -assumption that we have one STM store inaccurate there are other STM such as visual information, smells, touch and taste
    -assumption that there is one LTM store may be inaccurate there is episodic, semantic, procedural memory therefore there cannot be one LTM store
    -rehearsal not necessary to move info to LTM- traumatic + dramatic events go into LTM without rehearsal or sometimes rehearsal does not work
    -over-simplified
    -however is influential- generated other research

Information

Description
As Level Psychology (Working Memory Model) Flashcards on MSM and WMM, created by f.n97 on 05/04/2015.
Created by
f.n97
Views
1
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?