Mind map
Cognition Lecture 1
Map content
Cognition Lecture 1
Learning
- Ebbinghaus
- Scientific study of learning and memory
- Tested only himself
- Nonsense syllables (consonant-vowel-consonant items)
- Explored rate of learning and forgetting
- Total Time Hypothesis
- Amount learned is a function of the time spent learning
- Learning linearly related to amount of study
- Practice Makes Perfect
- Rule of thumb for over a century
- Effect of extensive practice levels out (Ericsson, 2013)
- Drives structural plasticity
- Maguire et al (2000) - Posterior hippocampus was consistently larger in taxi drivers, size correlated to length of time spent as taxi drivers
- Draganski et al. (2006) - increases in grey matter volume in parietal cortex and hippocampus in medical students taking exams - remained 3 months after
- Expansions normalisation hypothesis
- Some structural changes may be selected (e.g. learning a task) and others dropped
- Repetition
- Simple repetition with no attempt to organise the material may not lead to learning
- Complex and useless information
- Selective nature of memory and attention
- Simple repetition with no attempt to organise the material may not lead to learning
- Distributed Practice
- Distribute learning trials sparsely across a period of time
- Caveats
- Takes longer
- May feel "less efficient"
- Melton (1970) - benefits to memory occur with distributed practice despite total study time remaining the same
- Lag effect
- Baddeley and Longman (1978) - participants who trained for 1 hour a day for 11 weeks improved the most with typing
- Kornell and Bjork (2008) - spaced presentation led to better identification of paintings by same artist
- Participants reported superiority of massed learning
- Theories
- Deficient Processing
- Less attention is paid to recently-encountered stimuli
- Encoding variability
- Multiple encoding instances create richer associations
- Study-phase retrieval
- Second presentation is a reminder of previous one - strengthens memory
- Xue et al. (2010) - study-phase retrieval is favoured by the data
- Deficient Processing
- Testing/Generation Effect
- Karpicke and Roediger (2008) - continuous testing lead to better recall. No continuous testing meant little recall
- Having to retrieve the answer, rather than being presented with it, leads to greater retention
- Feedback
- Errors in recall may affect later recall unless corrective feedback is provided
- Erroneous retrieval may be strengthened
- Butler and Roediger (2008) - retrieval practice combined with feedback had biggest effect on memory
- Karpicke and Blunt (2011) - testing promoted superior memory for facts but also inferential questions
- Pps thought this method was least effective
- Expanding Retrieval Method
- Spacing Effect
- Spaced presentation enhances memory
- Testing effect
- Successfully generating items strengthens memory
- Spaced study-test cycles
- Spacing Effect
- Ebbinghaus
Motivation
- Motivation to learn makes learning more efficient
- Automatic - motives prior to exposure improves memory
- Strategic - people use deeper memorisation techniques for high value items
- Curiosity
- How curious you are to learn something affects internal motivation
- Gruber et al. (2014) - being curious enhanced memory for incidental material
- Motivation to learn makes learning more efficient
Brain and Learning
- Hebbian Learning
- Strengthening the connections of co-active neurons
- "Neurons that fire together, wire together"
- Long-Term Potentiation
- Bliss and Lomo (1973) - stimulated axonal pathways caused lasting increases in electric potentials in post-synaptic neurons
- Strong representation in hippocampus and surrounding regions - LTM!
- Amygdala - emotion-based learning and classical conditioning
- Strengthening the connections of co-active neurons
- Hebbian Learning
Information
- Description
- Psychology (Cognition) Mind Map on Cognition Lecture 1, created by Isabel LONGDEN on 12/01/2021.
- Created by
- Isabel LONGDEN
- Views
- 0
- Rating