Mind map
LT3 - Monotropic Theory
Map content
LT3 - Monotropic Theory
AO1
- General
- Innate
- Evolutionary Survival
- Protects Infants from hazards
- Evolutionary Survival
- Innate
- Social Releasers
- Innate cute behaviours
- Make adult feel love
- Cooing, smiling
- Encourage attention from adults
- Integral to innate attachment and reciprocity
- Innate cute behaviours
- Critical period
- 2 Years
- Very challenging to form strong attachemtn otherwise
- Long-term, irreversible consequences
- Social + Emotional
- Long-term, irreversible consequences
- Very challenging to form strong attachemtn otherwise
- Sensitive Period
- CP was too restrictive
- Overstating the matter
- CP was too restrictive
- 2 Years
- Internal Working Model
- Mental representation
- Model for future relationships
- 1st Relationship = Reliable?
- 1st Relationship = Abusive?
- Expectation for future
- Template
- Mental representation
- Monotropy
- Innate Predisposition
- One individaul
- Mother
- Insintcitve
- Adaptive
- 1 - Safety
- 2 - Healthy Emotional Relationships, develops IWM
- 3 - Secure base for exploration
- 2 - Healthy Emotional Relationships, develops IWM
- Mother
- Survival of genes
- Infant
- Survive to maturity, reproduce
- 1 - Safety
- More time with mother? The better.
- Law of continuity
- More constant and predictable the care is
- Better attachment
- More constant and predictable the care is
- Law of accumulated separation
- Effects of separation add up
- 'Safest dose is therefore zero dose'
- Effects of separation add up
- Law of continuity
- Innate Predisposition
- General
AO3
- Weaknesses
- P: Temperament
- E1: Child's genetically influenced personality
- E2: Babies are inherently more anxious or more social due to genes (Kagan)
- L: Lowers internal validity, research is measuring temperament, rather than attachment, a CV
- E2: Babies are inherently more anxious or more social due to genes (Kagan)
- E1: Child's genetically influenced personality
- P: Temperament
- Strengths
- P: Supporting Evidence, Social Releasers
- E1: Brazleton - Study 1: Obsvervations showed IS
- E2: Study 2 - Parents forced to ignore Social releasers
- E3: MOTIONLESS BABIES, distress
- L: Strength of reaction proves Bowlby right
- CP: Ethics?
- L: Strength of reaction proves Bowlby right
- E3: MOTIONLESS BABIES, distress
- E2: Study 2 - Parents forced to ignore Social releasers
- E1: Brazleton - Study 1: Obsvervations showed IS
- P: Supporting Evidence, IWM
- E1: Bailey et al - 99 mothers, 1 year old infants, Asked to report on their relationships with their parents
- E2: Bad attachment with mother = bad attachment with own infant (via observation)
- L: Credibility
- EX: Attachment quality assessed by researcher, reduces SDB
- L: Credibility
- E2: Bad attachment with mother = bad attachment with own infant (via observation)
- E1: Bailey et al - 99 mothers, 1 year old infants, Asked to report on their relationships with their parents
- P: Supporting Evidence, Social Releasers
- Weaknesses
Information
- Description
- A level Psychology (U6 MOCKS - ATTACHMENT) Mind Map on LT3 - Monotropic Theory, created by Kiran Bacchus on 17/02/2022.
- Created by
- Kiran Bacchus
- Views
- 0
- Rating
More on Bowlby's monotropic theory