GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Slides

2.4 Looking for Flaws: Evaluating Research

Bianca Rodriguez Psychology English 4 slides

Slides in this set (4)

  1. Sampling Bias

    • Samples need to be reasonably representative of the population. Sample composition (demographic makeup of age/sex/income/etc.) is similar to population. If this does NOT happen, generalizations may be inaccurate or skewed.
    • When there are doubts/concerns about the results of a study, first thing to examine is the composition of the sample.
  2. Placebo effects

    • Given to some subjects to control for the effects of subjects' expectations (which would be an extraneous variable).
    • Expectations can influence feelings, reactions, and behaviors; be powerful determinants of perceptions and behaviors when under empirical study
    • Should guard against placebo effects whenever subjects likely to have expectations that a treatment will affect them in a certain way by including a placebo condition in a study
  3. Distortions in Self-Report Data

    • *Questionnaires, interviews, personality inventories use self-report data and can have distortions:
    • Social desirability bias
    • Respondents misunderstand questionnaire items
    • Order in which questions are asked can shape responses
    • Memory errors can undermine accuracy
    • Some people tend to agree OR disagree with nearly all statements
    • Halo effect
  4. Experimenter Bias

    • Most researchers have an emotional investment in the outcome of the research
    • Researchers can sometimes see what they want to see. Can unintentionally influence subjects' behaviors through subtle nonverbal signals
    • Can be neutralized w/double-blind procedure

Information

Description
Replication and meta-analysis in research Common flaws in design and execution of research
Views
0
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?