Mind map
TYPES OF MEMORY
Map content
TYPES OF MEMORY
SHORT TERM MEMORY
- CAPACITY
- STUDY 1: JACOBS (1887)
- PROCEDURE
- Digit Span
- Researchers read four digits + increased until the ppt couldn't recall the order correctly
- FINDINGS + CONCLUSIONS
- Average = ppts could repeat back 9.3 numbers + 7.3 letters in the correct order immediately after they were presented
- CONDUCTED A LONG TIME AGO
- Lacked adequate control of extraneous variables
- EXAMPLE: some ppts may have been distracted while they were being tested so didn't perform as well as they might
- Confounding variables present as they weren't controlled
- BUT other results have confirmed Jacobs' findings, supporting the valisity
- PROCEDURE
- STUDY 2: MILLER (1956)
- PROCEDURE
- Made observations of everyday practice
- Noted how things came in 7s (musical scale, days of the week, deadly sins...)
- FINDINGS + CONCLUSIONS
- Span of STM = 7 items +/- 2
- Can be improved by CHUNKING (grouping sets of digits/letters into meaningful units)
- OVERESTIMATED CAPACITY
- COWAN (2001) reviewed other research
- Concluded that the capacity of STM = about 4 chunks
- Suggests Miller's lower end of 5 items is more accurate
- COWAN (2001) reviewed other research
- PROCEDURE
- STUDY 1: JACOBS (1887)
- DURATION
- STUDY 1: PETERSON + PETERSON (1959)
- PROCEDURE
- 24 students were given a consonant syllable to remember + a 3 digit number to count backwards for either 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds
- FINDINGS + CONCLUSIONS
- Recalled about 80% of the syllables correctly with a 3 second interval
- Average recall after 18 seconds = about 3%
- Duration of STM w/out rehearsal = about 18-30 seconds
- ARTIFICIAL STIMULUS
- Lacked external validity as memorising syllables doesn't reflect what you remember in real life
- But sometimes we do remember meaningless information such as phone numbers, so the study isn't totally irrelevant
- PROCEDURE
- STUDY 1: PETERSON + PETERSON (1959)
- CODING
- STUDY 1: BADDELEY (1966)
- PROCEDURE
- Acoustically similar + dissimilar words
- Semantically similar + dissimilar words
- FINDINGS + CONCLUSIONS
- Immediate recall = worse with acoustically similar words
- STM = acoustic
- Recall after 20 mins = worse with semantically dissimilar words
- LTM = semantic
- Immediate recall = worse with acoustically similar words
- DIDN'T USE MEANINGFUL MATERIAL
- When processing meaningful info, people may use semantic coding even for STM tasks
- Results therefore have a limited application
- Should be cautious when generalising the findings to different kinds of memory task
- PROCEDURE
- STUDY 1: BADDELEY (1966)
- CAPACITY
LONG TERM MEMORY
- DURATION
- STUDY 1: BAHRICK ET AL (1975)
- PROCEDURE
- Ppts = 392 Americans aged between 17-74
- RECOGNITION TEST: 50 photos from ppt's high school yearbook
- FREE RECALL TEST: ppts listed names of their graduating class
- FINDINGS + CONCLUSIONS
- Tested 48 years after graduation, recall was 70% accurate in photo recognition
- Free recall was less accurate
- HIGH EXTERNAL VALIDITY
- Real life, meaningful memories were studied
- However, confounding variables are not controlled as ppts may have rehearsed over the years by looking back at the photos
- PROCEDURE
- STUDY 1: BAHRICK ET AL (1975)
- CODING
- EPISODIC MEMORY
- STORES EVENTS FROM OUR LIVES
- Likened to a diary of daily happenings
- EXAMPLE: your most recent visit to the dentist, the psychology class you had yesterday, the breakfast you ate this morning
- EPISODIC MEMORIES ARE COMPLEX
- Time-stamped - you remember when they happened
- Involve several elements (people, places, objects are behaviours)
- Conscious effort to recall them
- CASE STUDY SUPPORT
- STORES EVENTS FROM OUR LIVES
- SEMANTIC MEMORY
- STORES OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD
- Combination of an encyclopedia + a dictionary
- EXAMPLE: includes knowledge of such things as applying to university, the taste of an orange + meaning of words
- NOT TIME STAMPED
- Less personal + more about the knowledge that we all share
- EXAMPLE: we don't usually remember when we first learned about 'Justin Bieber'
- STORES OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD
- PROCEDURAL MEMORY
- STORES MEMORIES FOR ACTIONS + SKILLS
- Memories of how we do things
- EXAMPLE: driving a car, playing table tennis
- RECALL OCCURS WITHOUT AWARENESS OR EFFORT
- Quite hard to explain to other people because we recall without a conscious effort
- EXAMPLE: explaining how to ride a bike, trying to tell someone how to change gear when driving
- STORES MEMORIES FOR ACTIONS + SKILLS
- DURATION
Information
- Description
- A2 Psychology Mind Map on TYPES OF MEMORY, created by Albie Quelcuti on 17/05/2017.
- Created by
- Albie Quelcuti · May 2017
- Updated
- May 18, 2017
- Views
- 0
- Rating