Mind map
LO3 - LEADERSHIP
Map content
LO3 - LEADERSHIP
Routes to Leadership
- Traditional - assumed by birth/hereditary
- Appointed
- legitimised by going through a selection/appt process
- Assumed
- said to 'seize the moment' - thrust into ldrshp due to crisis or event which brings out ldrship qualities
- e.g Rudi guilani - 9/11 attacks
- risk as these types of leader may not go in the direction you want your org to
- said to 'seize the moment' - thrust into ldrshp due to crisis or event which brings out ldrship qualities
- can be issues when next gen does not have same skills as predecessor
- Appointed
- Traditional - assumed by birth/hereditary
Functions
- Planning
- Initiating
- Controlling
- Supporting
- Informing
- Evaluating
Core Functions - Functional Approac
- John Adair 1983
- seminal model of 3 core functions
- research at military academy
- 3 Circles of Needs
- Task Needs
- Individual needs
- understand team, identify and agree objectives, reward where approp, develop and train
- Team maintenance needs
- during task initiation and execution and at conclusion of task
- establish, facilitate, delivery, monitor, effectiveness
- Individual needs
- key to success is in the leader achieving and maintaining the right balance for the group
- great emphasis on team member needs
- important to remember they will have concerns and priorities outside the task at hand - the team leader needs to recognise and address
- great emphasis on team member needs
- Task Needs
- Adairs work important for HR prof - supported the view that use of skills dev programmes was the correct way to dev leaders
- seminal model of 3 core functions
- considers what leaders do to be effective rather than examining what they are
- Model less relevant now - we have shifted from manufacturing to service driven economy
- leader now has to facilitate creation of the change agenda and also ldrship to its implementation
- this model developed when there was little focus on leadership
- more approp for junior managers
- this model developed when there was little focus on leadership
- the model introduced considerations of team/individual these areas today have far more significance
- leaders need to engage staff
- greater focus on 'soft' elements of role
- a skills only based dev prog would not fully prepare a new leader
- greater focus on 'soft' elements of role
- leaders need to engage staff
- leader now has to facilitate creation of the change agenda and also ldrship to its implementation
- John Adair 1983
LEVELS
- front line - team leadership
- operational - day to day
- strategic
LEADERS/MANAGERS - DIFFERENCES
- Richard Pascale 1990 - 'Managers do things right while leaders do the right thing'
- Managers do things by the book, follow org rules; leaders follow own intuition
- focus on detail/operationalise the vision
- short term focus
- linked to authoritarian leadership
- focus on detail/operationalise the vision
- do leaders roles involve more emotion?
- MGT - hard skills
- Ldrship - soft skills
- inspiration, vision, what drives people
- inspires trust
- links to engagement
- motivates
- inspires trust
- empower, innovate, challenge, set example
- inspiration, vision, what drives people
- KOTTER - 1990 - terms are diff but complementary
- Mgt deal with planning, budgeting, controlling - leadership is about behaviour and style
- it drawns on emotion - seeks to align ppl with a vision and turn it into a reality
- to be effective needs the skills of both
- it drawns on emotion - seeks to align ppl with a vision and turn it into a reality
- Mgt deal with planning, budgeting, controlling - leadership is about behaviour and style
- Ldrship and authority
- can be leaders without authority - e.g technical experts
Distributed leadership - new model
- system involving networks of leaders, operate at all levels across all boundaries
ORG STRUCTURE AND IMPACT ON ROLE OF LEADER
- FUNCTIONAL
- employees in each function - perform set of specialised tasks
- can cause siloed thinking and lack of communication
- leaders need to internally network
- can cause siloed thinking and lack of communication
- employees in each function - perform set of specialised tasks
- DIVISIONAL/PROD STRUCTURE
- functional expertise dispersed, leader needs to network within the division and across the org
- FUNCTIONAL
QUALITIES
- Typology of followers - Kellerman (2007) - dev based on levels of engagement
- Isolates
- Bystanders
- Participants
- Activitsts
- Diehards
- Activitsts
- Participants
- Bystanders
- Followers do not lack power
- Cynicism can affect followership
- to avoid - be yourself; walk the talk; listen and get close to your followers; build a send of 'we're all in it together; develop capacity; learn continuously and avoid blame culture
- Isolates
- 1990 - Kouzes/Possner
- 4 key qualities ppl look for
- Honesty
- competency
- Inspirational
- forward thinking
- combined together = CREDIBILITY
- 4 key qualities ppl look for
- Typology of followers - Kellerman (2007) - dev based on levels of engagement
THEORY
- TRAIT THEORY
- ppl born with certain traits of character/qualities are destined to be leaders
- theory assumes if you can identify those with correct traits you can identify those with leadership potential
- Roots in 19th century - 'Great Man Theory' - Carlyle and Spencer
- recent research confirms that it is not possible to identify consistent lists accepted by all as traits of a leader
- potential for bias where traits are used as criteria to select people - if only certain ones are used in studies then it makes the validity of data questionable
- CRITIQIUE
- gender bias when applying in selection processes as potential difference in perceptions of male and female ldrship qualities
- potential for cultural issues - a key trait a recruiter is looking for may not be displayed due to cultural norms
- nature or nurture??? - can traits be learned or are ppl born leaders?
- HR likely to view against belief that traits are unchangeable if they have exposure to opps and support mechs to help nurture a trait
- ppl born with certain traits of character/qualities are destined to be leaders
- certain traits more likely to appear
- some successful ldrs might be seen with specific traits but no evidence to suggest absence of that trait might make them a bad leader
- Charismatic leaders - able by power, magnetism and well dev skills of persuasiveness to engage others to follow a course of action
- also known as inspirational leadership - there can be ethical and unethical charismatic leaders
- TRAIT THEORY
BEHAVIOURS AND STYLES
- BEHAVIOURISTS
- consideration factors
- Initiation factors
- employee or job centred - 1960/70 Michigan Studies
- Douglas McGregor - Theory X and Y
- linked to motivation theory - how followers are motivated to perform
- X = controlling
- Y= encourage initiative
- STYLE THEORIES
- Lewin - 1939
- Authoritarian (Autocratic)
- Democratic (participative)
- found to be most effective
- Laissez-faire (delegative)
- research was simplistic - did not pay enough attention to the fact that situations are not absolute - relationships with team can vary
- good leaders will use combination of all 3
- Blake/Mouton - 1991
- Leadership grid - primary focus in orgs
- Lewin - 1939
- Effect of style on followers
- Daniel Golman (2004) - dev 6 styles
- effects on the emotions of those they are leading
- Visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, pace setting, commanding
- Daniel Golman (2004) - dev 6 styles
- Vision - Handy 1992 - ' a leader shapes and shares a vision which gives point to the work of others'
- Kouzes/Possner 2009 - attributes that distinguished leaders from non leaders in eyes of followers - being forward looking, shared view, enlisting others'
- research identified honest as number one requirement
- BEHAVIOURISTS
Information
- Description
- masters Leadership Mind Map on LO3 - LEADERSHIP, created by lknibb on 08/12/2013.
- Created by
- lknibb
- Views
- 54
- Tags
- Rating